Willingness and beliefs associated with reporting travel history to high-risk coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic regions among the Chinese public: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) that first occurred in Wuhan, China, is currently spreading throughout China. The majority of infected patients either traveled to Wuhan or came into contact with an infected person from Wuhan. Investigating members of the public with a travel history to Wuhan became the primary focus of the Chinese government’s epidemic prevention and control measures, but several instances of withheld histories were uncovered as localized clusters of infections broke out. This study investigated the public’s willingness and beliefs associated with reporting travel history to high-risk epidemic regions, to provide effective suggestions and measures for encouraging travel reporting. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted online between February 12 and 19, 2020. Descriptive analysis, chi-squared test, and Fisher’s exact test were used to identify socio-demographic factors and beliefs associated with reporting, as well as their impact on the willingness to report on travel history to high-risk epidemic regions. Results Of the 1344 respondents, 91 (6.77%) expressed an inclination to deliberately withhold travel history. Those who understood the benefits of reporting and the legal consequences for deliberately withholding information, showed greater willingness to report their history ( P < 0.05); conversely, those who believed reporting would stigmatize them and feared being quarantined after reporting showed less willingness to report ( P < 0.05). Conclusions As any incident of withheld history can have unpredictable outcomes, the proportion of people who deliberately withhold information deserves attention. Appropriate public risk communication and public advocacy strategies should be implemented to strengthen the understanding that reporting on travel history facilitates infection screening and prompt treatment, and to decrease the fear of potentially becoming quarantined after reporting. Additionally, social support and policies should be established, and measures should be taken to alleviate stigmatization and discrimination against potential patients and reporters of travel history. Reinforcing the legal accountability of withholding travel history and strengthening systematic community monitoring are the measures that China is currently taking to encourage reporting on travel history to high-risk epidemic regions. These non-pharmaceutical interventions are relevant for countries that are currently facing the spread of the epidemic and those at risk of its potential spread.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of stigma in infectious diseases, including COVID-19: a call to action

“…There was also a broad geographical and population distribution of included studies. There were 16 studies from Africa [ 14 , 24 , 59 , 68 – 73 , 75 – 79 , 84 , 88 ], 25 studies from Asia [ 22 , 60 , 61 , 64 – 66 , 74 , 80 , 81 , 83 , 86 , 87 , 90 – 95 , 97 – 99 , 101 , 102 , 104 , 105 ], and others were conducted in Europe [ 67 , 89 , 96 ], North America [ 62 , 63 , 85 , 100 , 103 ] and South America [ 82 ]. More than half (27 studies) of the studies were conducted within community populations [ 22 , 60 , 66 , 69 – 72 , 74 , 76 , 79 – 81 , 83 , 85 – 88 , 90 , 91 , 93 , 95 , 99 – 104 ], while others consisted of health care workers (13 studies) [ 60 , 61 , 63 , 64 , 67 , 77 , 78 , 84 , 89 , 92 , 94 , 96 , 105 ] and patients (eight studies) [ ...…”

“…(3) Would you touch someone who has recovered from Ebola? Wang et al, 2021 [ 102 ] China Cross sectional COVID-19 Enacted stigma 4191 4191 Community population 61.0 62.0 Items: Public discrimination against COVID-19 cases Wei et al, 2020 [ 87 ] China cross sectional COVID-19 Perceived stigma 1344 1344 Community population 60.1 57.4 Items: Reporting makes me feel stigma Yohannes et al, 2020 [ 76 ] Ethiopia Cross sectional COVID-19 Enacted stigma 247 247 Community population 23.5 83.8 Items: I felt that COVID-19 was a stigmatized disease Yu et al, 2020 [ 103 ] United States Cross sectional COVID-19 Perceived stigma 235 235 Community population 47.9 7.6* Items: Experience of discrimination: adapted from the Everyday Discrimination Scale Responses were averaged to indicate the overall experiences of discrimination participants perceived: (1) you are treated with less courtesy or respect than other people; (2) people act as if they think you are dangerous Yu et al, 2021 [ 104 ] China Cross sectional COVID-19 Perceived stigma 23863 23863 Community population 68.1 58.1 Items: Perceived discrimination due to COVID-19 Yufika et al, 2021 [ 105 ] Indonesia Cross sectional COVID-19 Enacted stigma 288 288 Health care workers 65.3 21.9 Scale: A six-item questionnaire [*Note]: S...…”

Iranians' beliefs about COVID-19: a cross-sectional study

“…With poor awareness and attitude towards COVID-19, safety protocol guidelines may be increasingly ignored, with nationwide discussions regarding home quarantine, observing protocols, the nature of the disease, and the manner in which information are provided, resulting in many believing factually incorrect and irrational information [17].…”

Epidemiology, Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, and Comorbidities of SARS-CoV-2 infected Pakistani Patients

“…Furthermore, an inclination to withhold travel history to high-risk epidemic regions also results in unpredictable outcomes (Wei et al 2020). The susceptibility of getting infected while coming in contact with confirmed COVID-19 patients (27%) may be attributed to person-to-person transmission, as reported in several similar studies (Cloutier et al 2020;Lechien et al 2020;Martinez-Fierro et al 2021).…”