2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01364-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: a systematic review with meta-regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
3
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the mode of this survey might influence our results. According to recent publications [ 12 , 13 ], surveys conducted over the internet or telephone are more likely to have a significantly higher value for WTP/Q than face-to-face surveys. This is what we call mode bias in surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Third, the mode of this survey might influence our results. According to recent publications [ 12 , 13 ], surveys conducted over the internet or telephone are more likely to have a significantly higher value for WTP/Q than face-to-face surveys. This is what we call mode bias in surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first performed univariate regression for all variables in Online Resource 2 (see ESM_2). Statistically significant variables in univariate regressions and factors mentioned in previous research were included in the multivariate regression [ 12 , 13 ]. We also conducted subgroup regression as well as sensitivity analyses for the whole sample and the improving quality of life and extending life length subgroups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ob in diesen Fällen die zusätzlichen Kosten und gesundheitlichen Effekte in einem akzeptablen Verhältnis stehen, ist eine Wertentscheidung und hängt von der Zahlungsbereitschaft des Entscheidungsträgers für eine zusätzliche Effekteinheit ab. In der internationalen Literatur wird für KNA vielfach eine Schwelle von < 50.000 US-Dollar pro gewonnen QALY oder vermiedenem DALY als akzeptabel angenommen [26].…”
Section: Methodik Der Gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluationunclassified
“…Some aspects of the link between this approach and welfare-economic theory have been clarified(Herrera-Araujo et al 2020). As previously noted for VSL, there are several meta-analyses(Kouakou & Poder 2022, Ryen & Svensson 2015b) from which it is possible to infer consistent country-specific values of a QALY.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%