2012
DOI: 10.2147/hiv.s33445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among female sex workers: a cross-sectional study in China

Abstract: BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a strategy developed to prevent individuals who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative from developing HIV infection. In China, while conducting a clinical trial to investigate the effectiveness and safety of PrEP, we performed this survey to assess the willingness of female sex workers to use PrEP, and identify predictors of this willingness.MethodsFrom July 2009 to April 2010, a cross-sectional study was carried out in four provinces of China. We recruite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents missed opportunities to initiate, or at least discuss, PrEP among PWUD. Limited PrEP awareness and use among PWUD here is similar to that reported elsewhere among female sex workers in China (Peng et al, 2012) and among other studies of PWUD in the U.S. (Kuo et al, 2016; Stein et al, 2014), but PrEP awareness was lower than that reported in studies of MSM (Ferrer et al, 2016; Goedel et al, 2016; Hoagland et al, 2016; Young et al, 2013). The higher level of knowledge about PrEP in MSM may stem from a number of PrEP initiatives that have primarily focused on MSM and HIV seronegative partners in sero-discordant couples (Ware et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This represents missed opportunities to initiate, or at least discuss, PrEP among PWUD. Limited PrEP awareness and use among PWUD here is similar to that reported elsewhere among female sex workers in China (Peng et al, 2012) and among other studies of PWUD in the U.S. (Kuo et al, 2016; Stein et al, 2014), but PrEP awareness was lower than that reported in studies of MSM (Ferrer et al, 2016; Goedel et al, 2016; Hoagland et al, 2016; Young et al, 2013). The higher level of knowledge about PrEP in MSM may stem from a number of PrEP initiatives that have primarily focused on MSM and HIV seronegative partners in sero-discordant couples (Ware et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A new PrEP cascade (Liu et al, 2012) suggests that PrEP uptake and optimal protective effect requires a high level of user awareness, willingness to initiate, and ability to remain highly adherent to the medication (Peng et al, 2012). Most recent studies that focus on PrEP uptake factors are concentrated on samples of MSM (Ferrer et al, 2016; Goedel et al, 2016; Gredig et al, 2016; Hoagland et al, 2016; Peng et al, 2012; Young et al, 2013), with limited research among high-risk PWUD (Kuo et al, 2016; Stein et al, 2014). For example, Stein et al (2014) found that 47% of PWUD reported being willing to use PrEP and that a higher perception of HIV susceptibility was associated with an increased willingness to initiate PrEP (Stein et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[65, 106, 108] Once the concept of PrEP was introduced, female sex workers across the world expressed strong interest in using PrEP across seven studies (N = 4809 total participants) [18, 24, 46, 65, 68, 106, 108]. Interest rose across these studies over time, in the range of 61–69% in 2010 –2012 [18, 65, 68, 108] up to 86% in 2014 [106]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple international studies have demonstrated PrEP acceptability among at-risk women including sex workers. (Guest, 2010; Eisingerich, Wheelock, & Gomez, et al, 2012; Mutua Sanders, & Mugo, et al, 2012; Peng, Yang, & Zhang, et al, 2012; Zhao, Sun, & Xue, et al 2011). While qualitative evidence indicates some acceptability among urban women at risk for infection in the US (Flash, Stone & Mitty, et al, 2014; Auerbach, Kinsky, & Brown, et al, 2015), relatively little quantitative data has emerged on acceptability among women, particularly with respect to HIV risk perception (Rubstova, Wingood, & Dunkle, et al, 2013), and many questions remain regarding PrEP delivery and implementation for women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%