1989
DOI: 10.1121/1.398713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind effects in shallow-water acoustic transmission

Abstract: Acoustic transmission in shallow water is degraded in the presence of high winds; losses can exceed 40 dB, after which they cannot easily be measured. Multifrequency studies have used pulse frequencies f from 312 Hz to 4.44 kHz, with path lengths 17, 23, and 137 km, and observations to about 15 m/s wind speed W. The main results show a dB attenuation proportional to f1.5W4, with a coefficient that depends on the season. They can be explained by a quantitative theory involving the scattering loss from the waves… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will be shown in the next section that d at Qiu et al's site is approximately equal to 6.9 m, which implies that t is less than approximately 1 m. The wind speed during this experiment was about 10 knots ͑Qiu, personal communication͒. Attenuation due to surface waves and subsurface bubbles at frequencies below 2 kHz at 10 knots for a water depth of 40 m is less than 0.1 dB/km ͑Weston and Ching, 1989͒. Chemical absorptivity at these frequencies and ranges is also small ͑Thorpe, 1965͒.…”
Section: Transmission Loss Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It will be shown in the next section that d at Qiu et al's site is approximately equal to 6.9 m, which implies that t is less than approximately 1 m. The wind speed during this experiment was about 10 knots ͑Qiu, personal communication͒. Attenuation due to surface waves and subsurface bubbles at frequencies below 2 kHz at 10 knots for a water depth of 40 m is less than 0.1 dB/km ͑Weston and Ching, 1989͒. Chemical absorptivity at these frequencies and ranges is also small ͑Thorpe, 1965͒.…”
Section: Transmission Loss Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7. Other causes of signal attenuation associated with squalls are surface waves, and bubbles due to concurring precipitation [50].…”
Section: Reverberationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency-dependent fading statistics, including the mean power, then render narrowband channel models inappropriate and call for more elaborate descriptions [20], [68], [69]. A frequency dependence of the mean received signal power may arise, for instance, due to a frequency dependence of bottom loss [70], [71], surface loss [49], [50], [63], absorption by seawater [7]- [10], and scatterers in the water column [72]. Frequency-dependent fluctuation rates occur when the channel has paths with different Doppler shifts [20], for instance, due to sea-surface interactions and platform motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) and 17-km (Ref. 6) paths in shallow water (1 -3 kHz in each case) do show an excess attenuation in TL upon the wind speed exceeding ϳ10 m / s. In the latter case it was postulated that near-surface bubbles were responsible for the excess attenuation, with the attenuation going as a function of frequency, f, and wind speed, U, as f 1.5 U 4 . However, converting long-range TL estimates into a more generalized metric, e.g., loss in dB/m, requires assumptions on the precise nature of the paths (eigenrays) responsible for signal delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%