2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(02)00295-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind effects on snowdrift on stepped flat roofs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And the snow distribution is dealt with digital image processing. The material is different from that of preference [1]- [8]. So the result is different from those lectures to some extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…And the snow distribution is dealt with digital image processing. The material is different from that of preference [1]- [8]. So the result is different from those lectures to some extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Lecture [8] point out that when the lower roof is on the windward side, a local sweeping wind flow occurred on the leeward side (x/H=0.1-0.5), resulting in a sudden decrease in snow depth. But in this paper, snow in Shanghai is too wet (humidity equals 88%) and the temperature is relatively high (-1℃).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in the figure, the snow depth distributions at various intervals are insignificantly different, indicating that after the experiment time for 300s the particle distribution almost reached equilibrium, which corresponds to 11.25h for the prototype as per Anno's time scale. The figure also presents Tsuchiya's field observation results for similar model in Hokkaido of Japan [23] . It can be seen from the figure that the test results are basically consistent with the field observation.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, it's believed that as long as the geometry dimension of model is greater than the saltation length of particles, the result error would be not so significant [12]. The saltation length of particle is about 10 times of the saltation height, and the average saltation height of par-ticle is approximately 1.6u * 2 /(2 g) [8], then the dimension of the model should comply with the following 2 * 8 1 u gL  (15) which can be satisfied readily in a usual wind tunnel test.…”
Section: Reynolds Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%