2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: The case of continental Ecuador

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
116
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end of the study, the region of Laudonovac village (L8) was selected as the best alternative for wind farm installation. Villacreses et al aimed to determine the most suitable location for installing a wind farm in continental Ecuador. They used AHP, Ordered Weight Averaging, VIKOR, TOPSIS, and Occupational Repetitive Actions methods.…”
Section: Use Of Mcdm Methods For Energy Policy and Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the study, the region of Laudonovac village (L8) was selected as the best alternative for wind farm installation. Villacreses et al aimed to determine the most suitable location for installing a wind farm in continental Ecuador. They used AHP, Ordered Weight Averaging, VIKOR, TOPSIS, and Occupational Repetitive Actions methods.…”
Section: Use Of Mcdm Methods For Energy Policy and Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of a wind power system depends on the weather conditions at the site, such as low air pressure, because a wind generator requires at least 3 m/s wind speed or above [76]. In addition, it must be in an area with a minimum chance of sudden disasters like powerful bursts of wind and floods which affect the performance of wind turbines [77].…”
Section: Climate Conditions (Tf3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, all the five methods agree that the hydropower‐electrolysis and coal gasification systems should be the top two choices, while the photovoltaic‐electrolysis is the most undesirable option. Taking one step forward, the final scores given by different MADM methods were quantitatively compared by using a Pearson correlation coefficient (PC) . To be specific, since PC = 1 implies a complete agreement, a strong correlation between the scores of the fuzzy GRP method and the previous approaches can be observed in Figure .…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis and Results Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%