2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind-induced vibration control and parametric optimization of connected high-rise buildings with tuned liquid-column-damper–inerter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is result implies that when inter-building passive control devices are installed to mitigate dynamic responses of the two adjacent high-rise buildings, the mitigation efficiency of the devices for wind-induced vibration control is better than the seismic vibration control. is anticipation is consistent with the previous works [8,43,44,48] from the authors dealing with wind-induced and earthquake-induced vibration mitigation with inter-building passive control devices. In these researches, different acceleration-dependent tuned inerter dampers, i.e., TMDI and TLCDI, were employed to control wind-induced and seismic responses of the two adjacent high-rise buildings analyzed in the present work.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…is result implies that when inter-building passive control devices are installed to mitigate dynamic responses of the two adjacent high-rise buildings, the mitigation efficiency of the devices for wind-induced vibration control is better than the seismic vibration control. is anticipation is consistent with the previous works [8,43,44,48] from the authors dealing with wind-induced and earthquake-induced vibration mitigation with inter-building passive control devices. In these researches, different acceleration-dependent tuned inerter dampers, i.e., TMDI and TLCDI, were employed to control wind-induced and seismic responses of the two adjacent high-rise buildings analyzed in the present work.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…After the installation of TMDI on the two adjacent buildings, the mean reduction coefficients of the top-level acceleration are 37.5% for Building 1 and 45.2% for Building 2 at the acrosswind direction, while the maximum corresponding reduction coefficients under seismic excitations are only 23.0% and 37.5% [43,44]. If TLCDI is installed to mitigate dynamic responses, the reduction coefficients of windinduced acceleration responses of Building 1 and Building 2 are 37.7% and 42.0%, respectively, while the corresponding reduction coefficients in case of seismic acceleration control are only 15.7% and 26.1% [8,48]. ese findings verify that both TMDI and TLCDI are more effective in controlling the wind-induced acceleration responses of adjacent high-rise buildings, as compared to earthquake-induced acceleration responses.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Vibration control is essential when designing buildings especially if they are tall, which are subjected to substantial vibration due to wind and earthquakes, and may be exposed to resonant vibrations with low-frequency content. To reduce the harmful effects of the resonant vibrations on the structures, mass dampers [1][2][3][4][5], liquid dampers [6][7][8][9], base isolators [10][11][12], and other supplemental damping systems [13] are among the various alternatives. This paper focuses on one of these methods, Tuned Liquid Damper (TLD), which is water confined in a container that uses the sloshing energy of the water to reduce the dynamic response of the structure during excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%