2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind power forecasting for a real onshore wind farm on complex terrain using WRF high resolution simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…RAW error results present a daily cycle, with values of the MAE around noon lower than during the night. These differences among the hourly WS MAEs are, however, not very significant, and the lower absolute errors at noon seem to be related with the better representation of turbulent fluxes during that part of the day [5]. In contrast, K-B 6 h errors do not follow a daily cycle, attaining values below 1.75 m/s mostly during daytime, but obtaining a worse result than RAW at 01 and 13 UTC.…”
Section: Wind Speed Nowcastingmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…RAW error results present a daily cycle, with values of the MAE around noon lower than during the night. These differences among the hourly WS MAEs are, however, not very significant, and the lower absolute errors at noon seem to be related with the better representation of turbulent fluxes during that part of the day [5]. In contrast, K-B 6 h errors do not follow a daily cycle, attaining values below 1.75 m/s mostly during daytime, but obtaining a worse result than RAW at 01 and 13 UTC.…”
Section: Wind Speed Nowcastingmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The horizontal resolutions of D02, D03, and D04 are 3 km (121 × 121 grid points), 1 km (91 × 91 grid points) and 333 m (91 × 91 grid points) respectively. As demonstrated in Prósper et al [5], the high horizontal resolution used over this complex terrain increases the accuracy of the wind forecast. The innermost domain has 67 vertical levels, 7 of which lie within the first 200 m above ground, at about 14, 41, 70, 99, 127, 156 and 184 m, a distribution that better captures wind and temperature variations in the surface layer [42] and improves the performance of the wind turbine parameterization [11].…”
Section: Wind Farm Location and Wrf Configurationmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations