IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005
DOI: 10.1109/pes.2005.1489483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind power generation reliability analysis and modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These indices are often employed in conventional electrical PS, the standard reliability test system is the IEEE-RTS, as a reference and simulation model. The most common indices used are as follows 94,114116 : loss of load expectation (LOLE), measured in hours per year; capacity outage probability table; load duration curve; forced outage rate (FOR); loss of energy expectation, measured in MWh/year; frequency of loss of load (FLOL), measured occurrence/year; duration per interruption, measured hour/occurrence; load not supplied per interruption, MW per occurrence; energy not supplied interruption, MWh/occurrence, 93,95 , time to fail (TTF) and Bayesian Network (BN), 117,118 , yearly interruption cost, interruption energy assessment rate; 96,119,120 expected generated wind energy 120,121 among others: wind generation interrupted energy benefit, wind generation interrupted cost benefit, equivalent capacity rate and load carrying capacity benefit ratio.…”
Section: Wind Energy and Its Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These indices are often employed in conventional electrical PS, the standard reliability test system is the IEEE-RTS, as a reference and simulation model. The most common indices used are as follows 94,114116 : loss of load expectation (LOLE), measured in hours per year; capacity outage probability table; load duration curve; forced outage rate (FOR); loss of energy expectation, measured in MWh/year; frequency of loss of load (FLOL), measured occurrence/year; duration per interruption, measured hour/occurrence; load not supplied per interruption, MW per occurrence; energy not supplied interruption, MWh/occurrence, 93,95 , time to fail (TTF) and Bayesian Network (BN), 117,118 , yearly interruption cost, interruption energy assessment rate; 96,119,120 expected generated wind energy 120,121 among others: wind generation interrupted energy benefit, wind generation interrupted cost benefit, equivalent capacity rate and load carrying capacity benefit ratio.…”
Section: Wind Energy and Its Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deshmukh and Ramakumar in [11] have used a Weibull distribution for wind speed modelling. Also, Weibull distribution for wind speed modelling in [3,10,12] and [20] was used. Giorseto and Utsurogi in [14], Wang, Dai, Hui and Thomas in [34] and Attvwa and El-Saadany in [4] have used Rayleigh distribution for wind speed modelling.…”
Section: Wind Speed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] introduces operation strategies of wind farm along with energy storage and evaluates the system reliability; however, it has not considered the storage system failure or its comparison with conventional generating units. Reference [10] evaluates the impact of wind power generation on system reliability using analytical approach. An algorithm to simulate the hourly wind speed using a time-series auto regressive and moving average (ARMA) model is presented in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%