54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind Tunnel Model Design and Fabrication of a 5.75% Scale Blended-Wing-Body Twin Jet Configuration (Invited)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research model in this paper is a typical configuration of a BWB aircraft designed by the CARDC, which is similar to the model in reference [41]. It represents the basic characteristics of BWB layout, although the appearance and parameters are different.…”
Section: Bwb Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research model in this paper is a typical configuration of a BWB aircraft designed by the CARDC, which is similar to the model in reference [41]. It represents the basic characteristics of BWB layout, although the appearance and parameters are different.…”
Section: Bwb Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An investigation was conducted through a combination of numerical simulation and wind tunnel experimentation. The research model is a BWB aircraft (Figure 1), which is similar to the model in Grellmann, 18 Vicroy et al, 24 and Dickey et al 25 and can represent the typical characteristics of the BWB layout. The two flat inner flow channels are symmetrically mounted on the back of the fuselage and are independent of each other.…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 The inner flow channel is usually mounted on the back of BWB fuselage; hence, the coupling effect of internal and external flows is serious. 25 The interaction between internal and external flows must be considered during the correction of test results. Consequently, the internal drag must be measured in the entire flow-through model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gap between trailing edge of the Krueger and the main element was varied during acoustic testing and was denoted by a matrix type notation as shown in Figure 2(a). Following this notation, a leading-edge Krueger configuration with a 40 deflection and the smallest gap, is denoted by 40 (3,3). Two leading-edge Krueger shapes were tested; the aerodynamic baseline and the acoustic Krueger are shown in Figure 2(b).…”
Section: Test Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leading-edge Krueger and brackets were removed for the model cruise configuration. More details on the model development can be found in Dickey et al 3…”
Section: Test Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%