2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind Tunnel Tests of Damage to the Tu-154M Aircraft Wing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its main conclusion is that an explosion on board of the Polish Tu 154M plane was the most probable cause of the crash. In the last few years, several papers addressing problems connected with the crash were published by the Conference participants in international journals [3][4][5][6]. The authors discuss information from the Terrain Awareness and Warning System (TAWS) installed on the crashed plane, the influence of the damage of the aircraft wing on its aerodynamic performance and the forms of damage of the aircraft components in their final state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its main conclusion is that an explosion on board of the Polish Tu 154M plane was the most probable cause of the crash. In the last few years, several papers addressing problems connected with the crash were published by the Conference participants in international journals [3][4][5][6]. The authors discuss information from the Terrain Awareness and Warning System (TAWS) installed on the crashed plane, the influence of the damage of the aircraft wing on its aerodynamic performance and the forms of damage of the aircraft components in their final state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jørgensen (2014) presented CFD study for the aerodynamic characteristic of a wing-damaged full-scale Tu-154M and its critical speed for landing. Krzysiak (2019) generated wind tunnel test at the Institute of Aviation (IL) in Poland using a 1:40 scale model of the 37.55 meters spanned Tu-154M. Nevertheless, Jorgensen’s work was not validated by the wind tunnel data, and Krzysiak’s paper only investigated the influence of damage by using wind tunnel method, so there is some disconnect between both studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wind tunnel test results with 1:100 scale model were correlated using CFD simulations. Similar wind tunnel test data generated by the Institute of Aviation (IL) in Poland (Krzysiak, 2019) using 1:40 scale of the same aircraft was also used for comparison. The CFD calculations were also validated by the flight test data and wind tunnel test results from this study and independent work by IL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%