1972
DOI: 10.2514/3.50149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind-Tunnel Wall Interference Reduction by Streamwise Porosity Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. (6) and, unless the values 8 2 cr (x, 8) are found to be satisfactorily small, one must re-adjust the wall configuration. The sensors then record new values <r m " (x, 8) and r m " (x, 8), and so forth until 8<x (x, 8) is as small as required.…”
Section: The Iterative Approach To Unconfined Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. (6) and, unless the values 8 2 cr (x, 8) are found to be satisfactorily small, one must re-adjust the wall configuration. The sensors then record new values <r m " (x, 8) and r m " (x, 8), and so forth until 8<x (x, 8) is as small as required.…”
Section: The Iterative Approach To Unconfined Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the art does not seem to have stabilised, for the demands upon the tunnel designer are often conflicting. He finds, for example, that a tunnel-wall configuration to prevent blockage is not the same as to eliminate wave reflection' 6 '. There have been proposals for refinements such as non-uniform distribution of porosities and/or plenum pressure < 5 ' 6 -7 ' 8 '.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimized and non-uniform porosity distribution along the test section centerline instead of an uniform value can be used in order to maximize the reduction of the wall interference over the widest possible Mach number range 1,2,3,4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%