2022
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.029315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind Turbine Efficiency Under Altitude Consideration Using an Improved Particle Swarm Framework

Abstract: In this work, the concepts of particle swarm optimization-based method, named non-Gaussian improved particle swarm optimization for minimizing the cost of energy (COE) of wind turbines (WTs) on high-altitude sites are introduced. Since the COE depends on site specification constants and initialized parameters of wind turbine, the focus was on the design optimization of rotor radius, hub height and rated power. Based on literature, the COE is converted to the Saudi Arabia context. Thus, the constrained wind tur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature illustrates different COE analysis, especially for the high-altitude cases. In comparison, Haykel et al 29 show that COE ranges from $0.052431/ kWh at 2500 m to $0.057057/kWh at 4000 m. Song et al 11 show that COE is between $0.05059/kWh and $0.05041/kWh at Huitengxtile wind farm (China, 2020 m altitude), and between $0.05153/kWh and $0.05172/kWh at Maanshan wind farm (China, 3200 m altitude). For the case of low altitude, Dalabeeh 38 presented a rich analysis for Jordan case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature illustrates different COE analysis, especially for the high-altitude cases. In comparison, Haykel et al 29 show that COE ranges from $0.052431/ kWh at 2500 m to $0.057057/kWh at 4000 m. Song et al 11 show that COE is between $0.05059/kWh and $0.05041/kWh at Huitengxtile wind farm (China, 2020 m altitude), and between $0.05153/kWh and $0.05172/kWh at Maanshan wind farm (China, 3200 m altitude). For the case of low altitude, Dalabeeh 38 presented a rich analysis for Jordan case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…11 Site-specific constants are the reference height H 0 (50 m), mean wind speed at reference height V m (4.8 m/s), shape factor at reference height k 0 (2), 27 wind shear coefficient α (0.1), 27 average temperature T (300.15 K) and turbine altitude H alltitude (600 m). Wind turbine parameters include maximum power coefficient C p max (0.48), 28 total loss of energy η (0.17), 29 cut-in wind speed V cut-in (3 m/s), cut-off wind speed V cut-off (22.5 m/s), rated wind speed V r (9.9 m/s), rated power P r (4000 kW) and the fix charge rate FCR (0.1158). 11 Using the site specific constants and wind turbine parameters, COE evaluation starts by calculating the scale factor at reference height c 0 [30][31][32][33] :…”
Section: Coe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uneven turbulent winds easily generate fluctuations in power generation, increasing the difficulty of grid integration [5], and VSWTs cannot withstand high rotor speeds and torques in extreme environments [6]. When the rotor speed is bigger than its rated value, the pitch angle is adjusted to maintain constant power output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%