2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winding out of the Swamp: Evading the weak gravity conjecture with F -term winding inflation?

Abstract: We present a new model of large field inflation along a winding trajectory in the field space of two axionic fields, where the "axions" originate from the complex structure moduli sector of a Calabi-Yau 3-fold at large complex structure. The winding trajectory arises from fixing one combination of axions by bulk fluxes and allows for a transplanckian effective field range. The inflaton potential arises from small "instantonic" corrections to the geometry and realises natural inflation. By working in a regime o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
206
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
206
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, an idea to evade the stringent bound on the axion field range has been suggested in [5] and [1]. This suggestion has recently been taken up by [21,22]. We will elaborate further on this idea and point out a number of hurdles that putative large field inflation models would need to overcome.…”
Section: Jhep04(2016)017mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, an idea to evade the stringent bound on the axion field range has been suggested in [5] and [1]. This suggestion has recently been taken up by [21,22]. We will elaborate further on this idea and point out a number of hurdles that putative large field inflation models would need to overcome.…”
Section: Jhep04(2016)017mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…12 Then |θ is an eigenbasis of the Hamiltonian with eigenvalues V (θ). We see by comparison with (3.26) that V (θ) = 2 cos θKe −S 0 .…”
Section: Jhep02(2017)097mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Thus, we are fixing one overall constant, but the bound is non-trivially satisfied as other parameters are varied, e.g., mass, rotation, and dimension. 11 The violation for small black holes seems to have been neglected in [1] and pointed out subsequently in [48].…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)039mentioning
confidence: 99%