2011
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-29-1985-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winds and tides in the mid-latitude Southern Hemisphere upper mesosphere recorded with the Falkland Islands SuperDARN radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
53
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The behavior of the observed phases and amplitudes of the tides at Hankasalmi are similar to tides at 95 km altitude observed with an All‐Sky Interferometric Meteor Radar at Esrange (68°N, 21°E) [ Mitchell et al , ]. The smaller tidal amplitude measured by the SuperDARN radars is a common feature that has been attributed to sidelobe effects [ Yukimatu and Tsutsumi , ] or to the combination of the large vertical integration of the SuperDARN radar together with a finite vertical wavelength of the tide [ Hibbins et al , ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The behavior of the observed phases and amplitudes of the tides at Hankasalmi are similar to tides at 95 km altitude observed with an All‐Sky Interferometric Meteor Radar at Esrange (68°N, 21°E) [ Mitchell et al , ]. The smaller tidal amplitude measured by the SuperDARN radars is a common feature that has been attributed to sidelobe effects [ Yukimatu and Tsutsumi , ] or to the combination of the large vertical integration of the SuperDARN radar together with a finite vertical wavelength of the tide [ Hibbins et al , ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Differences in the amplitude of the semidiurnal tide derived from noninterferometric Super-DARN radars and other MLT radar systems can largely be explained by the short vertical wavelength of this tide combined with the poor vertical resolution of the SuperDARN radar winds, with back lobe contamination of the SuperDARN radars playing a negligible role [e.g., Hibbins et al, 2011]. Although there is relatively poorer agreement in the amplitude of the smaller diurnal tide between SuperDARN and other radars, these differences have been ascribed to the diurnal variation in meteor count rate, with low meteor counts in the evening creating large uncertainties in the inferred winds [Hussey et al, 2000;Thayaparan and Hocking, 2002].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These AGWs are most likely to break at the mesopause, but measurements of mesospheric winds by SuperDARN are possible (e.g., Hibbens et al, 2011) as are radar echoes which have similar annual occurrence distributions to polar mesosphere summer echoes, PMSE (e.g., Ogawa et al, 2003;Hosokawa et al, 2005). The AGWs caused by the thunderstorms may be visible in the variabil ity of these observations.…”
Section: Superdarn and Energetic Charged Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have reported a summer maximum and equinoctial minimum in meteor counts with winter counts lying in between. Recently, using an extensive data base from both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, it has been established that the meteoric influx peaks around May-Aug and shows a good correlation with sporadic E layer intensities (Hibbins et al, 2011;Haldoupis, 2011, and references therein). In order to assess the difference in the meteor influx during 2007 and 2009, we used the radio observations of daily meteor counts recorded at Mie (35.0 • N,136.6 • E, dip latitude 29.8 • N), Japan (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%