Coliva (2020a) asks, "Are there mathematical hinges?" I argue here, against Coliva's own conclusion, that there are. I further claim that this affirmative answer allows a case to be made for taking the concept of a hinge to be a useful and general-purpose tool for studying mathematical practice in its real complexity. Seeing how Wittgenstein can, and why he would, countenance mathematical hinges additionally gives us a deeper understanding of some of his latest thoughts on mathematics. For example, a view of how mathematical hinges relate to Wittgenstein's well-known riverbed analogy enables us to see how his way of thinking about mathematics can account nicely for a "dynamics of change" within mathematical research-something his philosophy of mathematics has been accused of missing (e.g., by Ackermann (1988) and Wilson (2006)). Finally, the perspective on mathematical hinges ultimately arrived at will be seen to provide us with illuminating examples of how our conceptual choices and theories can be ungrounded but nevertheless the right ones (in a sense to be explained).