2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00975.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wine, alcohol and cardiovascular risk: open issue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a possible sex difference in the protective effect of alcohol might exist and explain apparently controversial results in different epidemiologic studies. Large studies are needed to test whether women are more susceptible indeed to the benefit of alcohol or if they more likely drink lower amounts of alcohol, thus receiving its maximal advantage [46,47].…”
Section: Is the Effect Of Alcohol Different In Men And Women?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a possible sex difference in the protective effect of alcohol might exist and explain apparently controversial results in different epidemiologic studies. Large studies are needed to test whether women are more susceptible indeed to the benefit of alcohol or if they more likely drink lower amounts of alcohol, thus receiving its maximal advantage [46,47].…”
Section: Is the Effect Of Alcohol Different In Men And Women?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rebuttal We challenge the validity of evidence supporting the generally accepted belief, as expounded by de Gaetano et al [1], that light-to-moderate alcohol consumption provides more health benefits than harms. Our argument is that uncontrolled confounding exaggerates the apparent benefits of light-tomoderate drinking and probably also leads to an underestimation of the harms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Forum [1][2][3][4][5] mentioned several times the known J-shaped relationship between total mortality and the amount of alcohol consumed, showing that low-to-moderate consumption of alcohol significantly reduces total mortality, while higher doses increase it. The protection usually decreases in adjusted studies, confirming the importance of confounding in assessing alcohol effects, but remains in a range of undoubted public health value.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations