2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-013-0944-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wing-moulting waterbirds maintain body condition under good environmental conditions: a case study of Gadwalls (Anas strepera)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). These results highlight the effect of local habitat conditions on realized moult‐related mass dynamics (Gehrold & Köhler ). Hence, waterbird species can be expected to choose their moulting habitat very carefully, in particular given their inability to revise their decision as soon as flight feathers are shed.…”
Section: Feeding Ecology Of the Five Study Speciessupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…). These results highlight the effect of local habitat conditions on realized moult‐related mass dynamics (Gehrold & Köhler ). Hence, waterbird species can be expected to choose their moulting habitat very carefully, in particular given their inability to revise their decision as soon as flight feathers are shed.…”
Section: Feeding Ecology Of the Five Study Speciessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…), nor is the loss of body mass an unavoidable consequence of moult (Young & Boag , Fox et al . , Gehrold & Köhler ). The important aspect to note in this context is that the potential for behavioural and physiological adaptations exists in wing‐moulting waterbirds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, gadwalls may exploit temporarily superior feeding grounds. They would thus be able to recover body stores depleted during the preceding breeding and/or moulting period (Oring 1969, King and Fox 2012, Gehrold and Köhler 2013) or to accumulate fat stores in preparation for winter when resources are most restricted for dabbling ducks (Alerstam and Högstedt 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of this hypothesis, we expect variability in the direction and destination of autumn movements to be more pronounced than during subsequent winter movements, when harsh climatic conditions should restrict movements towards warmer, generally more southerly locations. In addition, we expect that undirected autumn movements are 1) more frequent in juveniles which cannot rely upon prior knowledge about suitable autumn and winter habitats; and 2) less frequent in females than in males, because females moult later in the season (Ringelman 1990, Gehrold and Köhler 2013) and consequently suffer stronger temporal constraints during the subsequent movements towards wintering sites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%