2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8381.2007.00261.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winners and Losers during a Deep Economic Crisis: Firm‐level Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing*

Abstract: What happens to firms during periods of deep economic crisis? Depending on the nature of the crisis, the general effects are well known. However, owing to data availability, there are relatively few detailed firm‐level studies. With the aid of an unusually rich database, the present paper investigates the effects of Indonesia's 1997–1998 crisis on manufacturing establishments. Consistent with studies of other crisis episodes, foreign ownership and prior export orientation are found to be highly significant det… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
50
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding to the financial aspect, their relative shortcomings in terms of technological, managerial and human capabilities may reduce their capacity to overcome the economic crisis (Gertler and Gilchrist 1994;Forbes 2002;Beck et al 2005;Butler and Sullivan 2005;Régnier 2005;Marino et al 2008;Das and Pradhan 2009). On the other hand, their greater dependence on (fewer) customers and suppliers (Nugent and Yhee 2002) and markets (Butler and Sullivan 2005;Narjoko and Hill 2007;OECD 2009) may lead to increased difficulties in maintaining their activity level in the face of the crisis.…”
Section: Firm Size Firm Growth and Economic Downturnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adding to the financial aspect, their relative shortcomings in terms of technological, managerial and human capabilities may reduce their capacity to overcome the economic crisis (Gertler and Gilchrist 1994;Forbes 2002;Beck et al 2005;Butler and Sullivan 2005;Régnier 2005;Marino et al 2008;Das and Pradhan 2009). On the other hand, their greater dependence on (fewer) customers and suppliers (Nugent and Yhee 2002) and markets (Butler and Sullivan 2005;Narjoko and Hill 2007;OECD 2009) may lead to increased difficulties in maintaining their activity level in the face of the crisis.…”
Section: Firm Size Firm Growth and Economic Downturnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller enterprises may be more flexible in adapting to an economic downturn as they are less resistant to inertia, rigidity and sunk costs (Tan and See 2004), more able to exploit market niches (Gregory et al 2002;Narjoko and Hill 2007;Hodorogel 2009), being concentrated on activities characterized by economies of agglomeration, rather than economies of scale (Berry et al 2001;Hall and Harvie 2003), and less reliant on formal credits compared to their larger counterparts, who are more burdened by debts (Sato 2000;Wangel and Rodriguez 2006). Even their disadvantages at technological and knowledge levels can be overcome through the imitation of other firms' best practices (Nugent and Yhee 2002).…”
Section: Firm Size Firm Growth and Economic Downturnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding to the financial aspect, their relative shortcomings in terms of technological, managerial and human capabilities may reduce their capacity to overcome the economic crisis [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. On the other hand, their greater dependence on (fewer) customers and suppliers [23] and markets [19,24,25] may lead to increased difficulties in maintaining their activity in the face of the crisis. Papaoikonomou & all, [9] argue that in this context, most SMEs suffered from demand shock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These trends applied to practically all industry groups, but especially to textiles, clothing, and footwear, wood products, and non-metallic minerals (respectively ISIC 32, 33, 36). They also apply to most firm and ownership groups, though with considerable variations (see Narjoko (2006) and for a summary Narjoko and Hill (2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%