2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winners and losers: Exploring the differential impacts of agricultural expansion in Ethiopia and Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They may not have access to savings or credit that is needed to intensify agricultural production on their limited landholding. Hence the only option would be to expand into uncultivated land as long as the household has sufficient labor (Jellason et al, 2022).…”
Section: Loss Of Grazing Landmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may not have access to savings or credit that is needed to intensify agricultural production on their limited landholding. Hence the only option would be to expand into uncultivated land as long as the household has sufficient labor (Jellason et al, 2022).…”
Section: Loss Of Grazing Landmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reasons include drought, climate change, and variability [20,25,26], increasing demands for food and fuel [27], and increases in agricultural output prices and income [28,29]. In some countries, such as Zambia, most deforestation initially happens for timber extraction and charcoal production-the cleared land is then used for farming [30]. Nearly 4 Mha of African forests is cut down each year, at almost double the speed of the world's deforestation average [31].…”
Section: Land Use Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research was carried out as part of a transdisciplinary research project on Social and Environmental Trade-offs in African Agriculture (https://www.sentinel-gcrf.org/ accessed on 14 February 2023 The project explored the drivers and impacts of agricultural expansion into natural habitats-predominantly forests-in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Zambia, and how land use trade-offs are perceived and managed by stakeholders. Six locations (two per country, see Figure 1 and Table 1 for details) were systematically selected for field research in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Zambia, based on GIS analysis that identified agricultural/forest frontiers, using the following criteria [53]:…”
Section: The Research Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the impacts have been widely known and are mostly associated with booms and busts [5,6] as well as trade-offs, such as low, long-term real income levels per capita [5], the loss of biodiversity, and reduced carbon stocks [6][7][8]. The trade-offs are attributed to negative impacts resulting from a decline in the delivery of ecosystem services, although synergies have also been found [3,9,10]. Other negative impacts of cropland expansion range from changes in land quality [11] to nutrient losses with decreased agricultural productivity and soil ecosystem services [12,13], mostly caused by huge nutrient exports and a reduced capacity for recycling [14][15][16] caused by above and belowground carbon losses [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%