2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winners and losers from a commodities-for-manufactures trade boom

Abstract: A recent boom in commodities-for-manufactures trade between China and other developing countries has led to much concern about the losers from rising import competition in manufacturing, but little attention on the winners from growing Chinese demand for commodities. Using census data for Brazil, we find that local labour markets more affected by Chinese import competition experienced slower growth in manufacturing wages and in-migration rates between 2000 and 2010, and greater rises in local wage inequality. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Admittedly, this IV will also reflect demand conditions in those eight countries, but provided that those demand conditions are not correlated with those in the US, that should not present a problem for the IV. 8 In our paper, the IV should also be uncorrelated with US shocks. Since we are modeling exports, we aim to identify their impact on US employment from foreign demand shocks: those shocks would lead to a rise in exports and employment that is not contaminated by other shocks in the US market.…”
Section: Measuring Trade Exposurementioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Admittedly, this IV will also reflect demand conditions in those eight countries, but provided that those demand conditions are not correlated with those in the US, that should not present a problem for the IV. 8 In our paper, the IV should also be uncorrelated with US shocks. Since we are modeling exports, we aim to identify their impact on US employment from foreign demand shocks: those shocks would lead to a rise in exports and employment that is not contaminated by other shocks in the US market.…”
Section: Measuring Trade Exposurementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Since we are modeling exports, we aim to identify their impact on US employment from foreign demand shocks: those shocks would lead to a rise in exports and employment that is not contaminated by other shocks in the US market. Our first instrumental variable for export exposure uses the export expansion 8 Specifically, an unobserved common demand shock raises demand for the US domestic products, and therefore promotes employment, and will likely understate the impact of import shock. We present evidence in section 3 that foreign demand shocks are correlated with US import demand only through a common macroeconomic shock (equal across sectors), which is controlled for in our specification; see note 13.…”
Section: Measuring Trade Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adao (2015) focuses on shocks due to commodity prices and finds that they can account for only 5 to 10 percent of the fall of earnings inequality in Brazil. Also for Brazil, Costa et al (2016) examine the local labor market effects of import penetration of manufacturing goods and increasing demand for commodities from China and find that, if anything, the overall impact on inequality was mildly positive. Similarly, Halliday et al (2015) show that the fall of earnings inequality in Mexico that started in 1995 is inconsistent with traditional trade models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fukase (2014) finds provinces more exposed to the BTA experienced a relatively larger wage growth for unskilled workers. Costa, Garred and Pessoa (2016), in the case of Brazil, show that rising commodity demand in China is associated with wage growth in exposed Brazilian regions and an increase of workers in formal sector jobs. Brambilla, Lederman, and Porto (2013) use an Argentinian manufacturing firm dataset to examine the effect of export destinations on skills.…”
Section: Us-vietnam Bilateral Trade Agreement In 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%