2021
DOI: 10.1177/00323217211026189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winning, Losing, and the Quality of Democracy

Abstract: Citizens who voted for a party that won the election are more satisfied with democracy than those who did not. This winner–loser gap has recently been found to vary with the quality of electoral democracy: the higher the quality of democracy, the smaller the gap. However, we do not know what drives this relationship. Is it driven by losers, winners, or both? And Why? Linking our work to the literature on motivated reasoning and macro salience and benefiting from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems proje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 These estimates are taken from a re-estimation without the multilevel structure, because then we can take advantage of Stata's built-in calculations of total effects. 11 Even Daoust et al (2021), who find that political factors matter more as gross domestic product (GDP) goes up, show no clear evidence that political efficacy matters more than economic purchasing power for any set of countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 These estimates are taken from a re-estimation without the multilevel structure, because then we can take advantage of Stata's built-in calculations of total effects. 11 Even Daoust et al (2021), who find that political factors matter more as gross domestic product (GDP) goes up, show no clear evidence that political efficacy matters more than economic purchasing power for any set of countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In instrumental terms, this reduces the risk that policy will end up a long way from a citizen's ideal point (Anderson, 2010;André and Depauw, 2017;Ferland, 2021;Urbaniti and Warren, 2008). This consideration is where winner-loser status enters our model (see Nadeau et al [2021] for a review of the literature). 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I argue that electoral winners prefer the representation of their own camp (republican representation), whereas citizens of the losing side expect their MP to aim for the common good of the constituency (pluralist representation). Many studies show that winning or losing an election influences citizens' political attitudes, for instance, their democratic satisfaction (e.g., Nadeau, Daoust, and Dassonneville 2021), trust in institutions (e.g., Anderson and LoTempio 2002), and external efficacy (e.g., Davis and Hitt 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first independent variable of interest is party performance, that is, whether the respondent voted for a party that ended up in government or not; on this operationalization, see Anderson et al (2005), Nadeau et al (2021), and Stiers et al (2018), among others. 3 As for all the independent variables, it is taken from the post-electoral survey.…”
Section: Data and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%