2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winter is coming: What happened in western European mountains between 12.9 and 12.6 ka cal. BP (beginning of the GS1)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated in the introduction, the European archaeological record is divided into two distinct entities following the Gravettian period (Breuil, 1913): the "classical" Upper Paleolithic sequence in Northwestern Europe (Solutrean, Badegoulian, Magdalenian, Azilian and then Laborien/Ahrensbourgian/Swiderian) and the Epigravettian in the Northern Mediterranean and Eastern Europe. The Epigravettian differs from the Northwestern sequence particularly in regard to the continuity of the traditions, with a distinct tendency toward the simplification of debitage throughout the period (Naudinot et al, 2017;Tomasso et al, 2018). When trapezoids appear in the Venetian pre-alps during GS1, shortly before their Late Laborian counterparts (beginning of Holocene), the technological traditions are very different between regions in terms of techno-economic organization: where "a massive return of blades and bladelets with high qualitative standards occurred in Western Europe while the simplification process is still in course in the Epigravettian region" (Naudinot et al, 2017).…”
Section: Diffusion or Local Innovation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As stated in the introduction, the European archaeological record is divided into two distinct entities following the Gravettian period (Breuil, 1913): the "classical" Upper Paleolithic sequence in Northwestern Europe (Solutrean, Badegoulian, Magdalenian, Azilian and then Laborien/Ahrensbourgian/Swiderian) and the Epigravettian in the Northern Mediterranean and Eastern Europe. The Epigravettian differs from the Northwestern sequence particularly in regard to the continuity of the traditions, with a distinct tendency toward the simplification of debitage throughout the period (Naudinot et al, 2017;Tomasso et al, 2018). When trapezoids appear in the Venetian pre-alps during GS1, shortly before their Late Laborian counterparts (beginning of Holocene), the technological traditions are very different between regions in terms of techno-economic organization: where "a massive return of blades and bladelets with high qualitative standards occurred in Western Europe while the simplification process is still in course in the Epigravettian region" (Naudinot et al, 2017).…”
Section: Diffusion or Local Innovation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between the second half of GS-1 (Greenland Stadial-1, also referred to as Younger-Dryas; Walker et al, 2009) and first half of Preboreal (ca 12.5-11 Ka cal. BP), the European archaeological record can be divided into two techno-complexes: the Late/Terminal Epigravettian in the northern Mediterranean Basin and central-eastern Europe and industries characterized by the return of a well-developed blade technology in Northwestern Europe (Naudinot et al, , 2017Tomasso et al, 2018). Due to their technological consistency, these latter industries have been integrated in a large Western European techno-complex called "Regular Blades and Bladelets Industries" (Valentin 2008), "Pre-Mesolithic Straight Blade and Bladelet Industries " (Naudinot, 2010) or "Flat Blades Techno-complex (FBT)" (Naudinot et Jacquier, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15), como junto a ellas, panel 8, e incluso en paneles donde no se tiene constancia de las primeras. Una fase de tránsito y mantenimiento de previas cosmovisiones y técnicas paleolíticas que permite apuntalar una visión sobre la ocupación humana de la Península Ibérica y del arte de los últimos grupos de tradición paleolítica, que debería ser indefectible en el estudio de sus relaciones sociales y culturales y de las redes de intercambio locales, regionales y suprarregionales en momentos de cambio (SAUVET 2017) y donde las respuestas a los diferentes eventos climáticos registrados, preferentemente fríos, no tienen por que ser idénticas en territorios contiguos (TOMASSO et al 2018).…”
Section: I N C U L a C I ó N C O N O T R O S Enclaves Artísticos Paleolíticos Penínsulares Y Encuadre Cronoló-gicounclassified
“…During the lateglacial, the Southern Alps were peopled by Epigravettian groups. The Epigravettian technocomplexes originated from the Gravettian during the ALGM (Bietti, 1985;Broglio, 1997;Palma di Cesnola, 2001) and lasted until the Pleistocene-Holocene termination, showing changes in lithic technology, as well as in the mobility strategies and settlement pattern of their producers (Bertola et al, 2007;Duches et al, 2018;Mussi & Peresani, 2011;Naudinot et al, 2017;Peresani et al, 2021;Tomasso et al, 2018Tomasso et al, , 2020. As far as the settlement system is concerned, the peopling of ALGMglaciated land by the Epigravettian bands was a gradual process, with an early phase restricted to valley bottoms and plateaux around 500 m elevation and a later stage of upland occupation reaching altitudes of c. 1500 m asl, with development of a logistical occupation network based on seasonal mobility patterns (Angelucci, 1998;Duches et al, 2019;Fontana et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%