2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winter soil temperature and its effect on soil nitrate Status: A Support Vector Regression-based approach on the projected impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings suggest the importance of nitrogen availability in driving Q 10 variation under warming conditions, different from previous laboratory results, which emphasized substrate availability [39]. In addition to continuous input from available substrates under natural conditions, we speculated that intact soil profiles in field-based studies may be another reason [43,84]. For example, Sahoo et al [43] found that low temperatures in winter resulted in significant production of available nitrogen in deeper soil layers and that increasing temperatures during the transition from winter to spring benefited the movement of available nitrogen toward the soil surface.…”
Section: Soil Microbial Properties and Q 10 Variationscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings suggest the importance of nitrogen availability in driving Q 10 variation under warming conditions, different from previous laboratory results, which emphasized substrate availability [39]. In addition to continuous input from available substrates under natural conditions, we speculated that intact soil profiles in field-based studies may be another reason [43,84]. For example, Sahoo et al [43] found that low temperatures in winter resulted in significant production of available nitrogen in deeper soil layers and that increasing temperatures during the transition from winter to spring benefited the movement of available nitrogen toward the soil surface.…”
Section: Soil Microbial Properties and Q 10 Variationscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, numerous Q 10 values of soil respiration have been estimated using laboratory experiments over the last several decades, and this may have resulted in inaccurate Q 10 estimations [40,41]. Compared to field experiments, laboratory experiments do not consider the continuous input of organic material and the intact soil structure, both of which are important factors mediating soil respiration [39,40,42,43]. As reported previously, respiration from the new input of plant-derived carbon is more sensitive to temperature than that from soil-derived carbon [44], and isolated soil samples destroy the establishment of the temperature gradient-based movement of soil nutrients [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No difference in NO 3 − concentrations at 90 cm occurred between +H and -H within SIL lysimeters in any of the periods of 2017/2018, evidence that the artificial heating mostly affected the coarser soil. A soil warming effect on soil NO 3 − concentrations has been reported in the literature (Groffman et al, 2001;Joseph and Henry, 2008;Patil et al, 2010;Sahoo, 2022). This, combined with the greater likelihood of N adsorption by finer-textured soils due to the chemical properties of clays and their greater surface area for ion exchange (Lazaratou et al, 2020;Nouri et al, 2022), likely lead to the higher NO 3 − concentrations for LS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Still, the degree of skewness of soil temperature became closer to a normal distribution as the depth of soil increased. Compared with shallow soils, deeper soil temperatures were less susceptible to strong influences from soil surface temperatures and seasonal fluctuations in temperature [39]. The results of x std , C v , and C s also show that deeper soil temperatures were more stable and less volatile.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Processingmentioning
confidence: 90%