2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wintertime pollution level, size distribution and personal daily exposure to particulate matters in the northern and southern rural Chinese homes and variation in different household fuels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the sight of nation level in our study, the South was much higher than the North in any season. Previous studies 26,111 have demonstrated that the difference could be related to the heating policy and household biofuel combustion. In the cold season, pipeline heating was widely performed in the urban area of the North, 112 which would lead to a further worsening of outdoor air quality status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From the sight of nation level in our study, the South was much higher than the North in any season. Previous studies 26,111 have demonstrated that the difference could be related to the heating policy and household biofuel combustion. In the cold season, pipeline heating was widely performed in the urban area of the North, 112 which would lead to a further worsening of outdoor air quality status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results are consistent with the Lijiang study, which found that the individual daily PM 2.5 exposure concentration when LPG and electric stoves were used was 91 μg/m 3 , but when biomass fuel was used, it was 119 μg/m 3 . Other studies have also found that using biomass fuel for cooking increased PM 2.5 concentrations and that the use of cleaner fuels like natural gas and electricity did less harm to human health …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The exposure concentration exposure concentration when LPG and electric stoves were used was 91 μg/m 3 , but when biomass fuel was used, it was 119 μg/ m 3 . Other studies [17][18][19]25,47 have also found that using biomass fuel for cooking increased PM 2.5 concentrations and that the use of cleaner fuels like natural gas and electricity did less harm to human health. 55 Figure 5 shows the rural PM 2.5 exposure levels of smokers, passive smokers, and people who were not exposed to tobacco smoke (also listed in Table S3).…”
Section: Daily Average Personal Pm 25 Exposure Levelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations