2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2402147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wire dynamics model of the implosion of nested and planar wire arrays

Abstract: This paper presents the wire dynamics model (WDM), which can effectively replace the generic 0D (zero-dimensional) model in simulation of the implosions of arbitrary shaped wire arrays, including high-wire-number nested and planar array loads at multi-MA generators. Fast and inexpensive WDM modeling can predict the array implosion time and the rate of thermalization of the kinetic energy, and can estimate the timing of the x-ray pulse. Besides serving the purposes of the design and optimization of the wire arr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a cylindrical array, this is equivalent to the standard thin-shell 0D implosion model, but this approach is more general. Inductive current division still allows current to be distributed throughout the wires in a planar array, but causes current to peak in the few wires near the edge of the array with the outermost wires carrying a factor of 2-3 times more current than the innermost wires [11]. We expect this to be the most reasonable assumption for planar arrays, given the observations that the inner wires ablate and so must carry some current [8], but also that the inner wires experience little acceleration while the implosion commences at the outer wires and cascades inward [11,13] implying that somewhat less current flows in the inner wires.…”
Section: Pre-shot 0d-type Modeling For Load Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For a cylindrical array, this is equivalent to the standard thin-shell 0D implosion model, but this approach is more general. Inductive current division still allows current to be distributed throughout the wires in a planar array, but causes current to peak in the few wires near the edge of the array with the outermost wires carrying a factor of 2-3 times more current than the innermost wires [11]. We expect this to be the most reasonable assumption for planar arrays, given the observations that the inner wires ablate and so must carry some current [8], but also that the inner wires experience little acceleration while the implosion commences at the outer wires and cascades inward [11,13] implying that somewhat less current flows in the inner wires.…”
Section: Pre-shot 0d-type Modeling For Load Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a detrimental effect, leading to large MRT spatial broadening of the imploding mass, or it could be a positive effect leading to robust gap formation and high convergence in the MRT bubble regions. At the same time, the distributed mass in planar wire arrays is expected to help stabilize MRT growth during the implosion as the implosion front continues to snowplow wire material [11,12,13] (analogous to nested cylindrical arrays). It is not clear which of these effects will dominate the performance of planar wire arrays.…”
Section: Planar Wire Array Implosion Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A. Esaulov (University of Nevada, Reno) in designing the planar array loads for the May-June 2007 Saturn shots. Termed the "wire dynamics model" [27], the technique can be applied to single or multiply nested cylindrical arrays, or planar wire arrays. The model implicitly includes inductive division of current between the wires at each time step, and essentially applies F=ma to each wire in order to track its trajectory.…”
Section: Return Current Cagementioning
confidence: 99%