2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2879902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless Channel Models for Maritime Communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, K , and it is difficult to express C ( ) straightly without the expectation operator. Secondly, due to the mutual coupling of interference as shown in (11) and (13), C ( ) is not a concave function of , and (14) is a complicated non-convex problem. Thirdly, (k) is a function of w (k) and b (k) subject to (14e) and (14f), and it is intractable to obtain the optimal value of the coupled variables (k) , w (k) , and b (k) .…”
Section: Cooperative Coverage Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, K , and it is difficult to express C ( ) straightly without the expectation operator. Secondly, due to the mutual coupling of interference as shown in (11) and (13), C ( ) is not a concave function of , and (14) is a complicated non-convex problem. Thirdly, (k) is a function of w (k) and b (k) subject to (14e) and (14f), and it is intractable to obtain the optimal value of the coupled variables (k) , w (k) , and b (k) .…”
Section: Cooperative Coverage Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from terrestrial networks, geographical environment characteristics could be exploited for coverage optimization in the MCN. Previous channel modeling studies have suggested that maritime channels consist of only a few strong propagation paths due to the limited number of scatterers [11]. Some scatterers mounted in fixed locations, such as the lighthouses, reefs, and islands, can be observed using remote sensing techniques [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two comprehensive surveys on the different models available for the radio propagation over the sea are presented in [46] and [47]. The authors present and discuss the key features and the different models, taking into consideration other factors and parameters that can affect the propagation of near-sea-surface such as weather conditions, undulation, and mobility.…”
Section: B Models For Radio Propagation Over the Sea Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the second hop off-shore communication channel may substantially suffer from reflection by the sea surface, which may result in severe multipath effects. Therefore, in our model, an empirical loss Rician fading model is conceived for describing the first hop near-shore channel, which is given by [29]:…”
Section: A the Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system operates at a carrier frequency of 1.9 GHz and the noise level is set to be -30 dBW. The K-factor of the Rician fading channel is set to be 12.7 dB while the means and variance of the Rayleigh fading channel are 0 and 4, respectively[29]. Moreover, high gain antennas are assumed to mitigate the attenuation, and the transmit antenna gains of the BSA and of the RNs are set to 40 and 35…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%