2014
DOI: 10.1002/ente.201402067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless Communication in Oil and Gas Wells

Abstract: We review the techniques of below‐ground wireless communication in the oil and gas industry. A historical and theoretical analysis of pressure wave and electromagnetic communication is presented. Case studies for both technologies and their current applications are evaluated to identify the limitations of each method and opportunities for innovation. Finally, the possibilities of smart well technology are discussed with focus on sensors powered wirelessly for the continuous monitoring of shale oil/gas reservoi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contributions of this article relative to the existing literature on IoUT is summarized as follows: [28], smart seismic exploration [29], smart drilling, and smart oil and gas fields [30]- [32]. In this section, we cover the literature on the channel modeling and networking for EM-based IoUTs.…”
Section: A Related Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contributions of this article relative to the existing literature on IoUT is summarized as follows: [28], smart seismic exploration [29], smart drilling, and smart oil and gas fields [30]- [32]. In this section, we cover the literature on the channel modeling and networking for EM-based IoUTs.…”
Section: A Related Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been four major communication methods used until now for data transmission from the drill bit to the surface. These methods are cable operated communication, mud pulse telemetry (MPT), vibration telemetry, and electromagnetic (EM) communication (Franconi et al 2014). Among these different methods, the most popular is MPT, which is also the first method to become formally proposed in the industry as early as 1929 (Hughes 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this method is only applicable when the drilling fluid is running. Its data transmission rate is slow on the scale of 1-10 bits per second (Franconi et al 2014). This is why exploring other methods such as communication via structural vibration have become necessary, as it offers a faster data transmission rate (Franconi et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically there are four communication methods used, namely cable operated communication, mud pulse telemetry, vibration/pressure wave transmission and electromagnetic communication [3]. Among these, the most popular is mud pulse telemetry (MPT) which is a binary coding system and is the first of its kind to be used in the industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, due to signal attenuation in the fluid, its data transmission rate is slow on the scale of 1-10 bits per second. As a result, exploring other methods such as communication via structural vibration have become necessary [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%