2011
DOI: 10.1186/1687-1499-2011-161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless network positioning as a convex feasibility problem

Abstract: In this semi-tutorial paper, the positioning problem is formulated as a convex feasibility problem (CFP). To solve the CFP for non-cooperative networks, we consider the well-known projection onto convex sets (POCS) technique and study its properties for positioning. We also study outer-approximation (OA) methods to solve CFP problems. We then show how the POCS estimate can be upper bounded by solving a non-convex optimization problem. Moreover, we introduce two techniques based on OA and POCS to solve the CFP … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some scenarios, however, other distributions, e.g., an exponential, uniform, or Laplacian distribution, seem to be more reasonable to describe the model in (5) [22][23][24]. In the previous work [9,13,17], it is assumed that all measurement errors are positive and then it is concluded that a target node can definitely be confined to a bounded convex set, derived from the measurements. In fact, the intersection of a number of balls (with centers a i and radiî d i ), which is nonempty for range measurements with positive errors, definitely contains the target node position.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In some scenarios, however, other distributions, e.g., an exponential, uniform, or Laplacian distribution, seem to be more reasonable to describe the model in (5) [22][23][24]. In the previous work [9,13,17], it is assumed that all measurement errors are positive and then it is concluded that a target node can definitely be confined to a bounded convex set, derived from the measurements. In fact, the intersection of a number of balls (with centers a i and radiî d i ), which is nonempty for range measurements with positive errors, definitely contains the target node position.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the geometric interpretation in (7), we can derive estimators to get one point inside the intersection as an estimate. For example, the POCS or outerapproximation approach, picks one feasible point as an estimate [13,15,17]. Regardless of the type of the estimator, if an estimate of the target node position is available, we can define an upper bound on the position error e with respect to the feasible set B [9].…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then, using (9), one may compute several estimates of the higher-order statistic E s i=0 w ei t+i (p) of the prediction residuals, for j = 1, . .…”
Section: Confidence Regions As Defined By Lscrmentioning
confidence: 99%