2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02450-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless Pacing Using an Asynchronous Three-Tiered Inductive Power Transfer System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3 mm diameter wireless pacer was sufficiently powered for continuous pacing using 1.26 mW of power from a 40 mm diameter transmitter while remaining nearly 23 times below the SAR safety limits. This power requirement may be fulfilled via a rechargeable battery with charging intervals of over 5 months or up to years, depending on the pacing demand [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3 mm diameter wireless pacer was sufficiently powered for continuous pacing using 1.26 mW of power from a 40 mm diameter transmitter while remaining nearly 23 times below the SAR safety limits. This power requirement may be fulfilled via a rechargeable battery with charging intervals of over 5 months or up to years, depending on the pacing demand [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the suboptimal operational stability and output power, self-powered pacing devices have remained at the investigational stage. Alternatively, wireless power transmission, including magnetic induction, radio frequency (RF), and ultrasound, represents a viable strategy to charge the pacemakers in vivo (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). While the optimal coil design for sufficient power transfer efficiency can be developed for the implantable electronics, open-chest surgery (thoracotomy) is required to implant the bioelectronic patches onto the epicardium (surface of the heart) (22)(23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to product specifications and recent studies, leadless pacemakers are expected to have a battery life of 5–12 years, depending on patient needs. Currently, depleted leadless pacemakers are not extracted and are left implanted in the heart; however, studies have begun to investigate the potential for extraction. Patients who outlive their first pacemaker require additional implantation surgery, which increases the risks of infections and costs to patients. Numerous solutions have been proposed including wireless recharging, but the ideal choice is autonomous, self-sustainable powering because it eliminates the need for external power sources and promotes greater patient convenience and mobility. Energy harvesting, which is the capture of ambient energy, has the potential to allow for self-sustainable powering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%