2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless visual sensor networks for smart city applications:A relevance-based approach for multiple sinks mobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they attribute the mule role to vehicles with fixed trajectories and periodic schedule leading to an increased data delivery delay. In this regard, the works presented in previous studies are basically relevant to the research described here as they involve sensors deployed at fixed geographical positions. Lan and Wu, studied the feasibility of using public transport as DMs to collect information about road traffic collected by stationary sensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, they attribute the mule role to vehicles with fixed trajectories and periodic schedule leading to an increased data delivery delay. In this regard, the works presented in previous studies are basically relevant to the research described here as they involve sensors deployed at fixed geographical positions. Lan and Wu, studied the feasibility of using public transport as DMs to collect information about road traffic collected by stationary sensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data delivery latency is significantly high (in the order of 24 hours) which may not be suitable for short delay applications. In Peixoto and Costa, mobile sinks are used to collect data from sensor cameras. Mobiles sinks move towards relevant sensors according to dynamically computed optimal paths.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The wired network was adopted because the popular Zigbee-based wireless sensor network (WSN) is not suitable for underground communication. After all, the Zigbee-based WSN cannot support simultaneous high-quality transmission of various data with its narrow bandwidth [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. To sum up, our wire-based IUT communication and monitoring system consists of three parts: the ground management system, the underground wired network and the underground monitoring system containing multiple MISs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%