Objectives
The development of technical skills in peripheral and aortic endovascular intervention is an essential part of interventional radiology (IR) training. Access to endovascular training remains contentious, with IR and vascular surgery (VS) trainees competing for opportunities. The Collaborative Peripheral and Aortic Endovascular Training Survey (CPAETS) aimed to evaluate IR trainees' experiences, expectations, and barriers to endovascular training.
Methods
CPAETS was a joint survey between the British Society of Interventional Radiology and the Rouleaux Club (UK Vascular Trainees’ Association), open for 12 weeks and distributed to UK-based IR and VS trainees. This article focuses on IR trainee responses.
Results
Thirty-two responses were received from IR trainees across England, Scotland and Wales. Overall, 59% of respondents were satisfied with their endovascular training. IR trainees reported less regular hands-on experience of aortic endovascular procedures (50%) compared to peripheral endovascular procedures (93%). Consequently fewer trainees (65%) felt confident in achieving the necessary aortic endovascular competencies by the end of their training, compared to peripheral procedures (89%).
Conclusion
Limited exposure to aortic endovascular procedures resulted in reduced confidence levels in performing aortic intervention as compared to peripheral procedures. Potential solutions to bridge some of these IR training gaps include greater pre-operative and post-operative presence, the use of simulators and IR fellowships to ensure adequate training opportunities.
Advances in knowledge
This article provides a snapshot of the current gaps in IR endovascular training in the UK, with insight into solutions that can enable trainees to develop clinical and technical competencies required for IR consultant practice.
