2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
118
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
118
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, wisdom accepts the complex, cuts through ambiguity, and derives its energy from the tensions and uncertainties of a complex world. In short, the wise finds the best possible resolutions in complex and difficult situations when others do not; this may even mean choosing the best "bad" decision in diabolical situations (McKenna et al, 2009) .…”
Section: Power Of Progressive Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, wisdom accepts the complex, cuts through ambiguity, and derives its energy from the tensions and uncertainties of a complex world. In short, the wise finds the best possible resolutions in complex and difficult situations when others do not; this may even mean choosing the best "bad" decision in diabolical situations (McKenna et al, 2009) .…”
Section: Power Of Progressive Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, McKenna et al ( 2009 ) note that wise leaders use reasoned and careful observation, are practical and oriented toward everyday life (which, as noted above, Aristotle called phronesis ), have cognitive complexity and capacity to deal with complex and ambiguous environments, and are rational and deep thinkers who seek out facts and their origins, characteristics. Werhane ( 2002 ) defi nes systems thinking as "conceiving the system as a whole with interdependent elements, subsystems, and networks of relationships and patterns of interaction."…”
Section: On Teaching For Wisdom and Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of appreciation and understanding of the components of wisdom and particularly how to educate for wisdom is problematic in our increasingly complex, over-populated, and interconnected world. In the 'real' world, it is relatively easy to demonstrate the need for greater wisdom-if not its practice.Further, far too little consideration is given to how or even if wise and responsible leaders can be developed (though see Boal and Hooijberg 2001 ;McKenna et al 2009 )-that is, whether teaching for wisdom is even possible, and, if so, what it would take to do so. Using as the foundation an argument that wisdom exists when three foundational elements of philosophy-the good, the true, and the beautifuldiscussed here as moral imagination (the good), systems understanding (the true), and aesthetic sensibility (the beautiful), are integrated in a person (see Waddock 2010 ), I will explore what wisdom means and briefl y examine some of the implications of that defi nition for learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It included i information [3,4], intelligent [5,6], knowledge [7,8], expert [9,10] and decision support [15,16,[18][19][20][21] systems, plus developed multiple criteria methods (CODEC, COPRAS, DUMA and DAM [18,19]. The purpose was to determine the most efficient Advisory, Negotiation and Intelligent Decision Support System for Leadership Analysis (ANDES) to analyze a leader's life cycle.…”
Section: Introduction 2 Advisory Negotiation and Intelligent Decisiomentioning
confidence: 99%