2000
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WISP-2 as a Novel Estrogen-Responsive Gene in Human Breast Cancer Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent data analysis showed that some genes were differentially modulated under each of our two experimental conditions, thereby indicating partial overlap between the two datasets. The VGID data sets included genes previously shown to be regulated in response to E 2 or TAM, such as Hsp27 (Porter et al 2001), pS2 (Inadera et al 2000), cathepsin D (Inadera et al 2000, Safe 2001), c-myc (Doisneau-Sixou et al 2003), ERK1 (Rabenoelina et al 2002) and -catenin (Gunin et al 2003), thereby substantiating the validity of our experimental approach. The fact that only immunophilin expression changes were not corroborated by microarray analyses may be explained by the observation that quantitative information obtained with small cDNA inserts as well as clones arising from less abundant mRNA species could be unreliable due to their propensity to generate weak signals falling within the 'noise' of microarray hybridization signals (Yang et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Subsequent data analysis showed that some genes were differentially modulated under each of our two experimental conditions, thereby indicating partial overlap between the two datasets. The VGID data sets included genes previously shown to be regulated in response to E 2 or TAM, such as Hsp27 (Porter et al 2001), pS2 (Inadera et al 2000), cathepsin D (Inadera et al 2000, Safe 2001), c-myc (Doisneau-Sixou et al 2003), ERK1 (Rabenoelina et al 2002) and -catenin (Gunin et al 2003), thereby substantiating the validity of our experimental approach. The fact that only immunophilin expression changes were not corroborated by microarray analyses may be explained by the observation that quantitative information obtained with small cDNA inserts as well as clones arising from less abundant mRNA species could be unreliable due to their propensity to generate weak signals falling within the 'noise' of microarray hybridization signals (Yang et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of human WISP-2/CCN5 is induced by serum and by oestrogens in the MCF-7 human breast cancer cells (Zoubine et al 2001, Inadera et al 2002, Banerjee et al 2003. Moreover, Inadera et al (2000) showed that the oestrogen-induced upregulation of human (h) WISP-2/CCN5 was abolished by actinomycin D but not by cycloheximide treatment indicating a direct transcriptional control by oestrogen receptor (ER). Furthermore, the upregulation of WISP-2/CCN5 under oestrogen treatment could be independent of DNA synthesis (Inadera 2003) although it has been demonstrated that hWISP-2 is important for proliferation in MCF-7 cells (Banerjee et al 2003(Banerjee et al , 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations are consistent with human studies demonstrating that WISP-2/CCN5 mRNA and protein expression are ''biphasic'' and markedly higher in noninvasive lesions compared with adjacent invasive tumor cells where expression levels are reduced and only sporadically detected (7). Furthermore, like other members of CCN family, including Cyr61 (10), WISP-2/CCN5 is a serum-and sex steroid (i.e., estrogen and progesterone) -inducible early responsive gene in human breast tumor cells (7,11,12). Silencing of WISP-2/CCN5 gene functions minimizes serum-induced breast tumor cell proliferation (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%