Handbuch Wissenschaftssoziologie 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-18918-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wissenssoziologie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…For describing scientific inquiry as social epistemology, she questions the shortcomings of the existing forms of scientific criticism by showing the importance of constitutive and contextual values in scientific inquiry as well as the inability of existing forms of criticism to take them completely into account. Therefore her theory can be seen as a socio-epistemic one [27]. A core issue of her inquiry is the constitution of scientific objectivity by considering these different forms of values.…”
Section: What Is Scientific Practice?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For describing scientific inquiry as social epistemology, she questions the shortcomings of the existing forms of scientific criticism by showing the importance of constitutive and contextual values in scientific inquiry as well as the inability of existing forms of criticism to take them completely into account. Therefore her theory can be seen as a socio-epistemic one [27]. A core issue of her inquiry is the constitution of scientific objectivity by considering these different forms of values.…”
Section: What Is Scientific Practice?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epistemological question about internality and externality encompasses the notion that justifications either rely on facts to which the knowing one or individual has access to (or: knowledge evolves from individuals justifying their knowledge personally, also known as internalist position) or on reasons to which the knowing individual does not necessarily have to have access to (externalist position). Socioepistemic accounts mostly rely upon the externalist position [17,40]. In contrast, the distinction between internal and external validity in the quality criteria by Kuusi, Cuhls and Steinmüller do not directly refer to the future knowledge created, but to internal validity in forms of Bwell-organized process[es]^and Bpragmatic and organizational approaches^and to external validity in terms of sound reasons and relevant conclusions.…”
Section: Introducing Foresight Quality Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grundsätz-lich wird davon ausgegangen, dass Professionen (oder Berufe im Professionalisierungsprozess) sich auf spezifisches, professionseigenes Wissen beziehen (vgl. Schützeichel 2007, S. 550, Mieg 2003.…”
Section: Die Bedeutung Professionelles Wissens Für Deuten Und Handelnunclassified
“…Eine Reflexion der Forschungsergebnisse in Bezug auf Paradoxien professionellen Handelns findet sich in Kapitel 7.4 und 11.3. 20 Schützeichel (2007) …”
Section: Strukturelle Unbestimmtheit Professionellen Handelnsunclassified
“…und jüngeren Professionen (Sozialarbeiter, Ingenieure, Betriebswirte, Psychologen etc.) unterschieden werden muss (Brint 1996in: Schützeichel 2007. Wäh-rend jedoch die anglo-amerikanische Professionssoziologie mit der Erörte-rung von Werdegang und Stand verschiedener ‚professions' in den 1930er Jahren ihren Anfang fand (Mieg 2003, S. 12) 45 und sich seit den 1950er Jahren bis heute eine intensive Diskussion um ‚professions' nachzeichnen lässt (Schmeiser 2006, S. 301 Diese historisch gewachsene Verortung hat ihre inhaltliche Begründung: Die Berufssoziologie, die den Beruf in den Mittelpunkt der Bestimmung der sozialen Lage der Menschen in Industriegesellschaften stellte (Hillmann 2007, S.…”
unclassified