2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

With a little help from my friends: adopting a P-E fit perspective in understanding the value of organizational learning climate for sustainable employability

Abstract: PurposeThe objective of our study was to investigate how organizational learning climate (measured as developmental opportunities and team support for learning), career commitment, and age are related to employees’ self-perceived employability, vitality and work ability (e.g., their sustainable employability). Our study adopted a P-E fit perspective building upon the notion that sustainable employability is a function of both the person (P) and the environment (E) and tests a three-way interaction between orga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 114 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the literature on factors affecting employee SE is still limited. Scholars have only started identifying the impacting role of some personal factors (i.e., organizational awareness, self-knowledge, willingness to compromise, fear of stigmatization [9], and vertical trust [10]) and contextual factors (i.e., development opportunities [11], professional development [7], teamwork [10], relationship with co-workers and supervisors, autonomy and equipment sufficiency [12], leadership [9,13], HR practices [13], and SE policies [14]) on SE. Furthermore, definition and modeling of SE is still not univocal across the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the literature on factors affecting employee SE is still limited. Scholars have only started identifying the impacting role of some personal factors (i.e., organizational awareness, self-knowledge, willingness to compromise, fear of stigmatization [9], and vertical trust [10]) and contextual factors (i.e., development opportunities [11], professional development [7], teamwork [10], relationship with co-workers and supervisors, autonomy and equipment sufficiency [12], leadership [9,13], HR practices [13], and SE policies [14]) on SE. Furthermore, definition and modeling of SE is still not univocal across the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%