2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.164
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WITHDRAWN: A Survey on Event Detection and Prediction Online and Offline Models using Social Media Platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BCubed f1: The BCubed f1 of any tweet in the dataset is the average BCubed precision and BCubed recall (see equation (10), (11), (12)). The BCubed precision for a tweet captures the number of tweets in the cluster that have the same category according to the annotated label.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…BCubed f1: The BCubed f1 of any tweet in the dataset is the average BCubed precision and BCubed recall (see equation (10), (11), (12)). The BCubed precision for a tweet captures the number of tweets in the cluster that have the same category according to the annotated label.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the authors in [11] placed particular emphasis on offline and online event detection approaches in social media. They found that most of the reviewed studies fall under the offline category.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These approaches can generally be categorized into various groups, such as online or retrospective, supervised or unsupervised, and with or without neural word embedding 1 (such as word2vec and BERT) [1], [13], [4], [14]. While the online approaches ( [15], [16], [17]) focus on extracting topics from real-time posts (i.e., as soon as posts arrive), the retrospective solutions ( [18], [19]) receive a whole corpus (i.e., collections of recorded posts in the past) as an input for analysis in an offline manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%