WITHDRAWN: The relationship between EEG electrode and functional cortex in the international 10-20 system

Ives‐Deliperi, Victoria; Butler, James

doi:10.1016/j.cnp.2018.02.002

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The communication between the SMARTING and the recording computer was established through a Bluetooth connection. The electrode cap contained sintered Ag/AgCl electrodes that were placed based on the International 10-20 System [67].…”

Section: Neuroergonomic and Performance Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Neuroergonomic Assessment for the Evaluation of Mental Workload in an Industrial Human–Robot Interaction Assembly Task: A Comparative Case Study

Caiazzo,

Savkovic,

Pusica

et al. 2023

Machines

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The disruptive deployment of collaborative robots, named cobots, in Industry 5.0 has brought attention to the safety and ergonomic aspects of industrial human–robot interaction (HRI) tasks. In particular, the study of the operator’s mental workload in HRI activities has been the research object of a new branch of ergonomics, called neuroergonomics, to improve the operator’s wellbeing and the efficiency of the system. This study shows the development of a combinative assessment for the evaluation of mental workload in a comparative analysis of two assembly task scenarios, without and with robot interaction. The evaluation of mental workload is achieved through a combination of subjective (NASA TLX) and real-time objective measurements. This latter measurement is found using an innovative electroencephalogram (EEG) device and the characterization of the cognitive workload through the brainwave power ratio β/α, defined after the pre-processing phase of EEG data. Finally, observational analyses are considered regarding the task performance of the two scenarios. The statistical analyses show how significantly the mental workload diminution and a higher level of performance, as the number of components assembled correctly by the participants, are achieved in the scenario with the robot.

show abstract

Section: Neuroergonomic and Performance Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%