2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within and between population phenotypic variation in growth vigor and sensitivity to drought stress in five temperate tree species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil provides nutrients and the matrix for plants to grow and develop. Other studies have shown that the physicochemical properties of soil affect plant variability [54][55][56]. In the present study, we found that most L. cubeba phenotypes were significantly correlated with the geographic features of the sampling sites.…”
Section: Environmental Factors Affecting Fruit and Leaf Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Soil provides nutrients and the matrix for plants to grow and develop. Other studies have shown that the physicochemical properties of soil affect plant variability [54][55][56]. In the present study, we found that most L. cubeba phenotypes were significantly correlated with the geographic features of the sampling sites.…”
Section: Environmental Factors Affecting Fruit and Leaf Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Various patterns or processes not included in the model might reduce the intensity of selection on vigor compared with these simulations. For instance, environmental constraint limiting the phenotypic expression of vigor, within‐stand heterogeneity of disturbance regime, or phenotypic trade‐off between vigor and sensitivity to stress would reduce the correlation between vigor and tree size, thus reducing the intensity of indirect selection on vigor (Fririon et al., 2023). Resource allocation trade‐off between growth and reproductive functions (Wardlaw, 1990) or life history trade‐off between growth and longevity (Roskilly et al., 2019) would reduce the synergy of viability selection and fecundity selection on vigor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered two cases of initial population: a reference with no phenotypic variation in vigor, i.e., no QTL effects and no environmental variance, and a panmictic population with genetic and environmental variation. In the second case, we fixed the additive genetic variance at VA = 0.0042 with a null “inter‐step” component of the environmental variance, which corresponds to the average within‐population variance estimated in 22 populations of five tree species (Fririon et al., 2023), and narrow sense heritability at h 2 = 0.3, which is usually found for growth‐related traits (Alberto et al., 2013; Cornelius, 1994). It is worth noting that, even in the case without phenotypic variation in vigor, background inter‐individual variation of tree size arises from the growth process, depending on the initial tree sizes and local growth and competition processes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a large body of literature from forest inventories (Mina et al, 2018;Etzold et al, 2019;Abegg et al, 2020;Del Río et al, 2021), provenance studies (Sáenz-Romero et al, 2017), niche modeling (De Rigo et al, 2016), dendroecological studies (Bottero et al, 2021) and experiments (Frank et al, 2017;Fririon et al, 2023), there is still considerable uncertainty regarding the factors that determine the survival, vitality and growth of tree species and provenances under climate change and assisted migration. For over two centuries, scientists have conducted common garden (CG) experiments, also known as experimental plantations, to study the performance of trees from different genetic and/or geographic origins under identical environmental conditions (Langlet, 1971).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%