2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2013.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within and between systemic country risk. Theory and evidence from the sovereign crisis in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this type of estimation well reflects the default dependence among institutions, it can only capture one type of risk, which is credit risk. On the other hand, it is very useful in studying the nature of systemic sovereign credit risk (see Lucas et al, ; Ang and Longstaff, ), an analysis not feasible by using stock market data, and it has been used to analyse co‐movements between the banking system and risk in the public sector (Baglioni and Cherubini, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this type of estimation well reflects the default dependence among institutions, it can only capture one type of risk, which is credit risk. On the other hand, it is very useful in studying the nature of systemic sovereign credit risk (see Lucas et al, ; Ang and Longstaff, ), an analysis not feasible by using stock market data, and it has been used to analyse co‐movements between the banking system and risk in the public sector (Baglioni and Cherubini, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the crisis, the financial contagion in the stock market is revealed and comovements between the analyzed stock markets have become more noticeable. Baglioni and Cherubini (2013) and Metiu (2012) prove that the financially cross-border contagion in Europe increases on and after the sovereign debt crisis.…”
Section: Empirical Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other side, ignoring these relationships may induce a substantial bias in the estimates of the common factor itself. This problem is recognized by [1], who propose an estimator based on a model with standard bivariate Marshall-Olkin margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%