2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2012.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-family variation in obesity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The distributions in Figure 1 show that there is a large di¤erence in BMI overall regardless of the sibling types. This is consistent with the results in Price and Swigert (2012) that analyze a sibling sample from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Survey. The family …xed e¤ect estimation, however, has limited ability to remove the omitted variable bias.…”
Section: Empirical Modelsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 The distributions in Figure 1 show that there is a large di¤erence in BMI overall regardless of the sibling types. This is consistent with the results in Price and Swigert (2012) that analyze a sibling sample from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Survey. The family …xed e¤ect estimation, however, has limited ability to remove the omitted variable bias.…”
Section: Empirical Modelsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This implies there is variation in these key variables. Following Price and Swigert (2012), I next examine the distribution of BMI di¤erence between siblings. The Figure 1 plots distributions of the BMI di¤erence by sibling types using a kernel density.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, individual unobserved characteristics can be controlled for using data that include information about identical twins (Webbink et al, 2010;Price and Swigert, 2012). Since identical twins share the same genetic inheritance from their parents and growing environments, any differences in their obesity status must be accounted for by other factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for many if not most psychological constructs of interest, the variation observed in the population arises from the variation within families. This pattern of substantial within-family differentiation is seen in many attributes pertaining to a wide variety of psychological and health outcomes—and testing environmental effects using only between -family variation results in biased estimates (Almond, Chay, & Lee, 2005; Conley & Glauber, 2008; Gottfredson, 2004; Price & Swigert, 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%