2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-person biological variation estimates from the European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS) for serum potassium and creatinine used to obtain personalized reference intervals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33,36 Here, all II values were below 0.6, except for p-tau181 and Aβ42/Aβ40, which had slightly higher values, indicating marked individuality for these analytes. 33,36,72 This study has limitations. Although well powered in individuallevel serial sampling, the number of participants was relatively small, possibly affecting CV G more than CV I estimates.…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…33,36 Here, all II values were below 0.6, except for p-tau181 and Aβ42/Aβ40, which had slightly higher values, indicating marked individuality for these analytes. 33,36,72 This study has limitations. Although well powered in individuallevel serial sampling, the number of participants was relatively small, possibly affecting CV G more than CV I estimates.…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 84%
“…The RCV was calculated at a 95% bidirectional alpha (z = 1.65) as RCV = 100*(exp[± z x √2 x σ]–1), where σ = √ln(σ 2 CVi + σ 2 CVi ), with σ 2 CVi = ln(CVi 2 + 1) and σ 2 CVa = ln(CVa 2 + 1). The II was calculated as the ratio of CV I and CV G for each biomarker, indicating whether population‐based reference intervals can be useful for evaluating results 33,36 . We also calculated the number of samples needed to be collected to estimate an individual's homeostatic point (NHSP) with a “D” absolute percentage proximity to the individual's true value with the equation n = (z x √[CV I 2 + CV A 2 ]/D) 2 , in which z = 1.96, corresponding to a 95% alpha.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For laboratory parameters with a high index of individuality (II), defined as II = CV I /CV G , and especially for an II >1.4, the use of RIs is considered suitable. For laboratory parameters with a low II, i.e., when CV I is lower compared to CV G , the individual itself, rather than the reference population, is considered to be the best point of reference for the assessment of serial change ( 35 ). With an II of 0.3 ( 12 ), the latter also applies to the eGFR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%