2019
DOI: 10.1163/22941932-40190216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-ring variability of wood structure and its relationship to drought sensitivity in Norway spruce trunks

Abstract: Relationships between hydraulic vulnerability expressed as P50 (the air pressure causing 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity) and within-ring differences in wood density (WD) and anatomical features were investigated with the aim to find efficient proxies for P50 relating to functional aspects. WD and tracheid dimensions were measured with SilviScan on Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) trunk wood.P50 was strongly related to mean WD (r = -0.64) and conduit wall reinforcement ((t/b)2), the square of the rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only when water deficit further increases, embolism spreads in the EW and finally reaches the transition wood (Dalla-Salda et al, 2014). However, the loss in conductivity is not related to where the initial cavitation occurs, but to the wood anatomical structure (e.g., RWD and EW to LW ratio) that shapes the species vulnerability to drought events (Luss et al, 2019).…”
Section: Wood Density and Hydraulic Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Only when water deficit further increases, embolism spreads in the EW and finally reaches the transition wood (Dalla-Salda et al, 2014). However, the loss in conductivity is not related to where the initial cavitation occurs, but to the wood anatomical structure (e.g., RWD and EW to LW ratio) that shapes the species vulnerability to drought events (Luss et al, 2019).…”
Section: Wood Density and Hydraulic Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Basic wood density was the best proxy for P 50 as shown in earlier studies [20,29,44]. Wood density is, however, not that easily determined at the tree ring level, whereby techniques such as X-ray micro-density or high-frequency densitometry must be applied [24,30,31]. Differences in wood density result from changes in lumen diameter and cell wall thickness.…”
Section: Tangentially Measured Anatomical Traits Have a Higher Predic...mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The relationship between t/b and P 50 is tighter across conifer species than the relationships between pit anatomical traits and P 50 [22]. Several approaches to estimate proxies for P 50 based on tracheid dimensions can be found in the literature; measurements are either performed in the initially formed tracheid rows [23], in the entire earlywood [22,24], or in several radial files across the whole annual ring, where (t/b) 2 is thereafter assessed on tracheids that are in the range of defined hydraulic diameters e.g., [20,[25][26][27]. Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wood density is a key parameter with paramount importance for carbon sequestration and woody biomass production as well as for wood quality including various wood technological properties such as hardness and mechanical stability or calorific value (Wassenberg et al, 2015a). In addition, wood density has been frequently associated with the resistance of the xylem hydraulic architecture against embolism and hydraulic failure during drought (Martinez-Meier et al, 2008;Rosner et al, 2014;Luss et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%