2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2014.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-study measurement invariance of the UTAUT instrument: An assessment with user technology engagement variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypothesis 2-1 was dismissed because it indicated that effort expectancy did not have a statistical significance on intention to use smart health care service at the α=.05 and ß=.036, t=.417. This result did not support the preexisting studies [3,4,6,9]; it indicated that ease of use, ease of acquiring results and usefulness had nothing to do with user intention to use. Hypothesis 2-2 was accepted because it showed that social influence did have a statistical significance on user intention to use smart health care service at the α=.05 and ß=.167, t=1.911.…”
Section: Hypothesis Verification Using Multiple Regression Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hypothesis 2-1 was dismissed because it indicated that effort expectancy did not have a statistical significance on intention to use smart health care service at the α=.05 and ß=.036, t=.417. This result did not support the preexisting studies [3,4,6,9]; it indicated that ease of use, ease of acquiring results and usefulness had nothing to do with user intention to use. Hypothesis 2-2 was accepted because it showed that social influence did have a statistical significance on user intention to use smart health care service at the α=.05 and ß=.167, t=1.911.…”
Section: Hypothesis Verification Using Multiple Regression Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Hypothesis 2-3 was accepted because it showed that performance expectancy did have a statistical significance on user intention to use smart health care service at the α=.05, ß=.289, and t=3.412. This result did support the preexisting studies [3,4,9,10]; it indicated that user intention to use smart health care service was positively affected by helping health enhancement, time saving, health condition improvement through the smart health care service. Hypothesis 2-4 was dismissed because it showed that facilitating conditions did not have a statistical significance on user intention to use smart health care service at the α=.05, ß=.094, and t=1.268.…”
Section: Hypothesis Verification Using Multiple Regression Analysissupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gender has been widely studied as a main demographic variable related to ICT adoption (Parameswaran et al, 2015). Venkatesh et al (2003) suggested that performance expectancy is the strongest predictor for men, whereas effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions are the strongest predictors for women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penerimaan dan penggunaan sistem informasi telah menjadi fokus utama pada literatur dan penelitian yang masuk dalam lingkup sistem informasi (Parameswaran, Kishore, & Li, 2015 (Williams, Rana, & Dwivedi, 2015). Studi ini menggunakan model UTAUT untuk menganalisis persepsi aparatur desa terhadap penggunaan sistem e-village budgeting yang telah diwajibkan oleh Pemerintah Banyuwangi telah mewajibkan sistem e-filling sebagai implementasi kebijakan menteri dalam negeri (Permendagri) untuk menggunakan sistem informasi dalam mengelola dana desa.…”
unclassified