2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-007-0819-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within-subject variability of measures of beta cell function derived from a 2 h OGTT: implications for research studies

Abstract: Some OGTT-derived indices of beta cell function, in particular the insulinogenic index, demonstrate high within-subject variability. Integrated measures that utilise multiple time points and measures that use C-peptide show less variability and may lead to a reduced sample size requirement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
81
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
15
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regression method we used corrects this bias by incorporation of a factor computed as the ratio of the variances of the error in the y to x variables (16). The error estimates for these measurements (57.1% for ⌬I 0 -30 /⌬G 0 -30 , 24.9% for incAUC ins/glu , 16.6% for 1/fasting insulin, and 16.4% for HOMA-S) were based on the day-to-day coefficients of variation in a group of subjects with various glucose tolerance (11). A hyperbolic relationship was presumed if the 95% CI of the slope included Ϫ1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regression method we used corrects this bias by incorporation of a factor computed as the ratio of the variances of the error in the y to x variables (16). The error estimates for these measurements (57.1% for ⌬I 0 -30 /⌬G 0 -30 , 24.9% for incAUC ins/glu , 16.6% for 1/fasting insulin, and 16.4% for HOMA-S) were based on the day-to-day coefficients of variation in a group of subjects with various glucose tolerance (11). A hyperbolic relationship was presumed if the 95% CI of the slope included Ϫ1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several limitations of this study should be considered. First, insulinogenic index has been characterized by marked within-subject variability in previous studies [32]. InsAUC 30 /GluAUC 30, rather than insulinogenic index, has been reported to have a stronger correlation with the AIR measured by the IVGTT [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…35 The insulinogenic index, a measure of the early insulin response to oral glucose, was calculated as the difference in insulin concentration divided by the difference in glucose concentration from fasting to 30 minutes. 36 Glucose AUC was calculated as a measure of glucose tolerance. 37 …”
Section: Measurements Of Glucose and Insulin Homeostasismentioning
confidence: 99%