Witness Vetting: What Determines Detectives' Perceptions of Witness Credibility?

Abstract

During the course of a criminal investigation witness vetting, a detective's process of determining the credibility and weight of witness information, can lead to errors in an investigation that can go virtually unchallenged. Witness confidence, opportunity to view, and type of information proffered were examined in relation to detective inferences about witness reliability, accuracy, and probable cause to arrest. Experiment 1 involved 39 sworn law enforcement officers, and experiment 2 involved 43 sworn law enforcement officers and 86 mock detectives. Participants viewed a digital recording depicting a witness describing a gas station robbery (Experiment 1) or a campus mugging (Experiment 2). Witness confidence and detectives' inferences about culprit information influenced the vetting process and lent credibility to a confident witness whose accuracy was objectively unknown. Furthermore, the evidence indicates that sworn law enforcement are comparable with untrained observers in their use of social inference cues (i.e. confidence) in determining witness credibility; however, social inference can be assuaged by the rational, rule‐governed, decision framework established for witness vetting. Social inference processes inherent in the detective‐witness dyad is influenced by legal procedures in vetting witness information. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Evidence strength (insufficiently) affects police officers’ decisions to place a suspect in a lineup.

“…In cases in which evidence-based suspicion is not present, perhaps officers could conduct an investigatory lineup in which a positive identification provides the grounds to detain the suspect for a short period of time while other evidence is developed to link the suspect to the crime. After all, officers make decisions that are guided by both social inference factors and legal parameters when they make investigatory decisions (McClure et al, 2013). Thus, a clearer legal framework, paired with review panels that monitor the types of situations that lead to identification procedures to ensure adherence to those policies, might provide the accountability that is needed to change police practice.…”

Trust but verify: The biasing effects of witness opinions and background knowledge in workplace investigations

“…Tightly connected to the perceived credibility of the witness is witness confidence. Confidence has been shown to moderate individuals' credibility ratings of a witness in that individuals who rate a witness as more confident they also rate them as more credible (McClure et al, 2013;Weinsheimer et al, 2017).…”

Children as alibi witnesses: the effect of age and confidence on mock-juror decision making

“…The participants were informed that the case involved a stabbing during the course of a robbery, and the charge of murder was brought against the defendant. Similarly to Brewer and Burke (2002) and McClure, Myers, and Keefauver (2013), realistic verbal hedges by the alibi witness, such as 'erm' and 'I think', were used to decrease the alibi witness's confidence in the lowconfidence condition.…”