2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Witnesses of coherence and dimension from multiphoton indistinguishability tests

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Methods and note S1, we recall why the overlap inequalities of ( 17 , 20 ) serve as set coherence witnesses. The first nontrivial inequality bounding coherence [Galv 17] was experimentally investigated in ( 18 ) and bounds the three overlaps of a set of three statesr0,1+r0,2r1,21…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Methods and note S1, we recall why the overlap inequalities of ( 17 , 20 ) serve as set coherence witnesses. The first nontrivial inequality bounding coherence [Galv 17] was experimentally investigated in ( 18 ) and bounds the three overlaps of a set of three statesr0,1+r0,2r1,21…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prove that the inequality violated by pure qutrits cannot be violated by qubits, complementing this result with numerical and experimental investigations, and we perform a similar analysis for our inequalities violated by ququart and ququint systems. In doing so, we extend the dimension witness result from ( 18 ) both qualitatively and quantitatively, making the best use of the flexibility and accuracy of our multimode processor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where each |v l , λ v l v l , λ v l | or |w l , λ w l w l , λ w l | corresponds to the state of the system after a measurement (related to observable V or W) has been performed on it and an outcome (v l , λ v l ) or (w l , λ w l ) has been obtained. As we will see shortly, the various fundamental concepts discussed so far-namely, the KD distribution in equation ( 3), its extended version in equation ( 4), the quasiprobability behind the OTOC in equation (11), the post-selected quantum Fisher information in equation (5), and the expression for weak values in equation ( 2)-are all written in terms of Bargmann invariants, which we review next.…”
Section: Otocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we will consider the relative purity f (ρ, ) := Tr(ρ ) as a natural distinguishability measure of two quantum states [29]. Importantly, such an informationtheoretic quantifier has been useful in the study of quantum speed limits [30][31][32][33], information scrambling and Loschmidt echoes [34,35], and also for probing quantum coherence from photonic metrological setups [36]. While not being a distance in the stringent sense, the relati-ve purity is symmetric, f (ρ, ) = f ( , ρ), non-negative, f (ρ, ) ≥ 0, for all states ρ and , and vanishes for the case in which the states are maximally distinguishable.…”
Section: Relative Purity and Equilibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%