2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.96.052323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Witnessing arbitrary bipartite entanglement in a measurement-device-independent way

Abstract: Experimental detection of entanglement of an arbitrary state of a given bipartite system is crucial for exploring many areas of quantum information. But such a detection should be made in a device independent way if the preparation process of the state is considered to be faithful, in order to avoid detection of a separable state as entangled one. The recently developed scheme of detecting bipartite entanglement in a measurement device independent way [Phys. Rev. Lett 110, 060405 (2013)] does require informati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the usual Bell inequal-ity violation scenario or the standard EWs one, where the measurements are used as inputs to construct the inequality, a set of quantum states are used as inputs to evaluate a payoff function for any state in case of the semi-quantum nonlocal games. For other works on MDI-EWs, see [27][28][29][30]. The measurement-device-independent scenario is also implemented in various other contexts like quantum key distribution [31], verification of quantum steering [32], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the usual Bell inequal-ity violation scenario or the standard EWs one, where the measurements are used as inputs to construct the inequality, a set of quantum states are used as inputs to evaluate a payoff function for any state in case of the semi-quantum nonlocal games. For other works on MDI-EWs, see [27][28][29][30]. The measurement-device-independent scenario is also implemented in various other contexts like quantum key distribution [31], verification of quantum steering [32], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [16], based on the work of Ref. [14], a measurement-device-independent (MDI) universal entanglement witnessing was given for two qubits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, for a two qudit system, an MDI universal scheme for witnessing the NPT-PPT divide was designed in Ref. [16] for all finite values of d. Also, it was conjectured in Ref. [16] that a universal entanglement witnessing scheme for bipartite systems with dimension higher than six can not exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown [32,33] that any universal entanglement detection scheme on a single copy of a state, has to be necessarily a state tomography process. Recently, the protocol in [29] was extended to the completely device independent scenario [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%