2011
DOI: 10.1097/pdm.0b013e31820b49e2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wobble-enhanced ARMS Method for Detection of KRAS and BRAF Mutations

Abstract: Monoclonal antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor have expanded the range of treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, somatic mutations in the KRAS and BRAF genes have proven to be molecular predictors of resistance to treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in these patients. Thus, we have developed a sensitive mutation assay, wobble-enhanced amplification refractory mutation system, for detecting the 8 most commonly reported mutations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Input in the KRAS and NRAS assays were 10 ng and 20 ng DNA, respectively. Analyses for the BRAF V600E mutation was performed as described by Hamfjord et al [48]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input in the KRAS and NRAS assays were 10 ng and 20 ng DNA, respectively. Analyses for the BRAF V600E mutation was performed as described by Hamfjord et al [48]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…THxID™-BRAF used an ARMS based PCR technology. ARMS PCR approaches have been widely and successfully used to detect somatic mutation in routine research, notably BRAF mutations [16,29,30]. One of the advantages of ARMS-PCR is that the assay is designed to amplify a relative larger common fragment of DNA that flanks the mutation site in all samples regardless of their mutation status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KRAS mutations (codons 12 and 13) were determined using the Wobble-enhanced amplification refractory mutation system [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%