1967
DOI: 10.5636/jgg.19.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wobbling Motion of the Geomagnetic Dipole Field in Historic Time During These 2000 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

1968
1968
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The curve in Fig. 1 obtained from a comparison of Occidental and Oriental aurorae seems to be in accordance with the result obtained by Kawai et al (1965), through our preliminary result is still of insufficient accuracy to test the wobbling motion of the geomagnetic field in historic time as suggested by Kawai and Hirooka (1967).…”
Section: Ancient Aurora! Records In Chinasupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The curve in Fig. 1 obtained from a comparison of Occidental and Oriental aurorae seems to be in accordance with the result obtained by Kawai et al (1965), through our preliminary result is still of insufficient accuracy to test the wobbling motion of the geomagnetic field in historic time as suggested by Kawai and Hirooka (1967).…”
Section: Ancient Aurora! Records In Chinasupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This is not the case for archeomagnetic measurements for the interval 250 AD. to 750 A.D. For example, virtual poles for archeomagnetic results from Arizona and Japan (Kawai and Hiraoka, 1967) are 16 degrees apart, which is larger than experimental error and is comparable with the dispersion in virtual poles due to the present dipole field.…”
Section: Interval Of 1500 Yearsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…8). The motion is similar to the quasi-hypotrochoid motion proposed for the dipole wobble by KAWAI and HIROOKA (1967). They explained the motion of VGP from the archeomagnetic data by combining two different rotations of a main dipole; one rotation has a period longer than the other and its rotational sense is opposite to the others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%